In traffic fatalities in the United States the more disadvantaged
you are, the more likely you are to die
in car crashes than people who are well-off.
Research by Sam Harper, Thomas J. Charters and Erin C.Strumpf in the American Journal of Epidemiology finds that improvements in road
safety since the 1990s haven’t been evenly shared. The biggest declines in
fatalities have occurred among the most educated. As for people 25 and older
with less than a high school diploma, fatality rates have actually increased
over time, bucking the national trend: The underlying issue here is not that a
college degree makes you a better driver. Rather, the least-educated tend to
live with a lot of other conditions that can make getting around more
dangerous. They own cars that are older and have lower crash-test ratings.
Those with less education are also likely to earn less and to have the money
for fancy safety features such as side airbags, automatic warnings and rear
cameras.
The number of trauma centers, the researchers point out, has
also declined in poor and rural communities, which could affect the health care
people have access to after a collision. And poor places suffer from other
conditions that can make the roads themselves less safe. In many cities, poor
communities lack crosswalks over major roads. The residents who live there may
have less political power to fight for design improvements like stop signs,
sidewalks and speed bumps. As a result, pedestrian fatalities in particular are
higher in poor communities. “It’s true that there are big differences in the quality
of the residential environments that people have in terms of their risks of
accidental death as pedestrians,” Harper says.
In 1995, death rates adjusted for age, sex and race were
about 2.5 times higher for people at the bottom of the education spectrum than
those at the top. By 2010, they were about 4.3 times higher. That means the
inequality of traffic fatalities is getting worse, even as it looks nationwide
as if our roads are getting safer. As we increasingly fantasize about new
technologies that will save us from our own driving errors cars that will brake
for us, or spot cyclists we can’t see, or even take over all the navigation we
should anticipate that, at first, those benefits may mostly go to the rich.
No comments:
Post a Comment