Demonstrations
against war have failed to end wars. It should now be apparent that
anti-war sentiments have not been able to banish the curse of warfare
from the world. The solution does not lie in electing new
governments. If the anti-war movement looks beyond the symptoms,
they'll come to understand how the disease itself is generated. Class
rule is the root cause, for governments themselves are the
instruments of their respective ruling classes. The capitalist owners
of industry control the major media and the machines of the two major
parties. Their influence is directly felt through the campaign
process, various forms of lobbying, and plain old corruption. And, by
their control over the economy, they exert a less direct but
pervasive control over the affairs of state. This is why "liberal"
politicians proclaiming peace end up serving the same "business
as usual" of the arms manufacturers once in office. That is why,
even though government rulers are reluctant to go to war, they are
superceded by the demands of their class to maintain and build on a
military threat to facilitate further expansionism. That is why peace
efforts are consistently thwarted. And this is why petitions, moral
appeals, and mass marches don't bring substantive results -- and
cannot.
All
wars have to be presented as great moral crusades to the people who
are expected to endure the suffering. Without the participation of
the working class in the economy or in the military services, no war
would be possible. But unfortunately, the working class is
disorganised. In every country in the world, it is so fragmented as
to be powerless. They are therefore obliged to obey their rulers or
face death, jail, or starvation. Workers have common class interests.
They are all exploited and oppressed by the ruling classes, and they
have suffered grievously from their ruler's wars and preparations for
war. That is the penalty workers pay for their failure to understand
their potential for self-liberation through socialist organisation.
When they do so, and only then, their desire to live in peace can be
fulfilled. Workers objectively share an interest in peace. Class
antagonisms, conflicting commercial interests and national rivalry
cannot be papered over by facile formulas concocted at conference
negotiation tables.
When
anti-war campaigners attack militarism but yet uphold the capitalist
system, they are fighting an effect while defending the cause. As
long as the antiwar or peace movements and the working class in
general refuse, or are unwilling, to recognise the cardinal point
that capitalism with its production for profit and private ownership
of the tools of production is the cause of war, they will find
themselves fighting endless reforms or effects under capitalism which
never lead to a solution but only to frustration and despair. The
only road to permanent peace lies in the abolition of capitalism and
its replacement by socialism under which goods will be produced for
use and the means of wealth production will be owned in common.
Workers in the anti-war movements, must listen to and heed the logic
of the Socialist Party. Socialism being a class-free cooperative
society in which there will be no exploitative capitalist class as at
present to fight over the surplus wealth stolen from the working
class and encourage wars to get rid of it. The causes of war that
existed under capitalism will no longer exist with socialism. Only in
socialism can permanent peace become a reality instead of just a
dream as at present. All of the energy, enthusiasm and exertions of
the anti-war protesters will come to nothing unless they quickly
learn that capitalism is the cause of war and that the Socialist
Party provides the only means by which the present ruling class can
be dethroned by a power greater than theirs.
We
believe that the conclusion is inescapable that the only way to end
war and the permanent threat of war is by a fundamental change to an
entirely new social system. Socialism is the common ownership by all
the people of the means of production and distribution. Socialism
means direct control and management of all industries and social
services by the workers through a democratic decision-making process.
This system would provide for real social control of economic and
social policy, and unlike the system now in place, it would be truly
express the wishes of the people. Instead of despotism, socialism
means democracy. Instead of production for sale and the profit of a
few, socialism means production to satisfy human needs and the wants
of all. Instead of the form of government we have today -- a
political state controlled by the ruling class – socialism means a
self-management of working people themselves. By establishing such a
social system, society would be free of the ruling-class motives and
economic drives that impel the existing social systems to dominate
other nations and expand that domination. We would have instead a
rational, democratically planned economic system that could function
harmoniously on a worldwide scale and creating a stable, secure
world.
Peace
movements have come and gone, but militarism in general and the arms
races have continued. It's up to us, as potential collateral damage,
to stop war by building not just a peace movement, but a movement to
change to a new society. We can build a world of peace, plenty and
freedom, or tolerate the destruction of civilisation and of ourselves
by the ruling class. Our choice is one of taking action to build a
better world or of being inactive while the capitalist despotic
destroyers end the world for all of us. Our "war" is the
class struggle, and the enemy we must face is right here, not over
there. Our fellow-workers will not advance their own interests by
lining up behind their ruling classes in their bloody national
conflicts. The only hope for a lasting peace lies with the working
class and its creation of a viable international socialist movement.
Toward that end workers must stop drawing national and religious lines
and start drawing class lines. Workers' enemies are not workers in
other countries but the ruling classes of all countries, their own at
the top of the list. The choice is clear: socialism or perpetual war.
If
as we say, our case is correct, then it is imperative that anti-war campaigners act accordingly by adopting the socialist
perspective and moving the replacement of capitalism to the top of
its demands. Humanity cannot afford to ignore the socialist solution
to the menace of militarism.
However, we do not expect -- nor
ask -- anyone to take our views and position on faith alone. What we do ask
is that you consider it, question us on it, challenge it, compare it
with what others propose - and then either reject it, citing your
reasons for doing so or accept our arguments and join us in our effort to
implement the case for socialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment