The
Socialist Party is made up of working men and women -some might say
"ordinary people." They are factory workers and service
sector workers, schoolteachers and college professors. Some are
retired. Some are young, they are old, and they are everything in
between. However, it would seem that workers in large numbers should
be responding to the Socialist Party's propositions but they are not
and we have failed to experience the growth one would expect in a
world full of chaos. That the Socialist Party is not as large and
influential today as we would all like, and as it should be, is a
fact, and there's no doubt about it. Does that mean that it has been
wrong for all these years? The Socialist Party is based on a
principle, and as with any true principle it corresponds to a
reality. If a principle reflects a fact -- as, say, a principle of
mathematics -- then it is true and ought to be heeded. If it does not
correspond to a fact -- then it is false and misleading -- and it
ought to be discarded and branded as being wrong. The Socialist
Party's ideas are based the Materialist Conception of History and, in
particular, the class struggle. Were we right or wrong to say that
reforms and reformism would only prolong suffering, cause confusion
and delay real progress? Has our prediction proved right or wrong?
There
are numerous signs around us showing that the class struggle is
growing more intense every day. Millions of workers have been thrown
into permanent unemployment, and millions more are destined to follow
as automation and "down-sizing" continue their advance. As
that advance progresses, more of the excruciating poverty and misery
that has afflicted large segments of the working class for decades,
even generations, spreads through the land and embraces even larger
segments of our class. It is a fact that the class struggle is
heating up. It is a fact that
being against the practice of reformism has long been correct. There
has been no mitigation or amelioration if the intensity of the class
through the palliative measures of gradualism and reformism. The only
viable path open for the working class to follow to resolve that
struggle has been socialism, only socialism and nothing less than
socialism. It is a fact that the Socialist Party is the only
organisation that is clear on those principles, and the only
organisation capable of giving clear expression to them. Considering
the truth of that, the Socialist Party should be gathering strength,
and members in large numbers. Our fellow-workers should be heeding
its call. Yet, they are not. Why not?
Although
every other party or movement endeavours to address the social
question -- be they political, religious or whatever – the one
thing that they all share in common is that none of them offer any
real challenge to the misconceptions, illusions, prejudices or fears
of the people they attract. They have no interest in challenging
them, for that would only "scare" people away. They count
on and build upon those fears. They thrive on them, nurture and
exploit them. That is the key to their "success." And as a
result they also eventually disappoint those whom they attracted. All
these false movements, have contributed greatly to the confusion and
the judgement of working people, weakening their hope and dashing
their courage. Hence the apathy and cynicism in the midst of misery;
hence despondency despite unequalled distress. Too often people become
infatuated with these other movements and organisations and that many
of these other organisations claim that they are “socialist” is a
deplorable fact, and one that must be confronted and exposed. To keep
men and women in the dark on the class struggle is to keep them in
the dark as to the way out, and cause them to be fodder for every
populist politician that comes along.
If
you want to do something to make sure that our history is not a
repetition of the last 115 years; then join with your fellow-workers who comprise the membership of the Socialist Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment