Hundreds of thousands of young people are being encouraged
into low-skill, low-pay, on-the-job training schemes to meet ministers’ “mad”
target of creating three million apprenticeships by 2020, new figures reveal. 60
per cent of all new apprentices are now studying for qualifications worth no
more than five GCSE passes. In contrast, less than 3 per cent of new
apprenticeships were at the higher level – equivalent to a foundation degree. There
have been only 220 new science and maths apprenticeships created at any level,
while engineering and manufacturing apprenticeships make up fewer than one in
five of the new jobs.
The roles being offered on the Government’s website appear
to be little more than traditional school-leaver jobs in clerical, catering and
retail work “rebranded” as apprenticeships. There are now apprenticeships in
street cleaning, warehouse labouring and shop work. This allows employers to
pay a new 18-year-old worker just £2.73 an hour compared with the national
minimum wage for that age range of £5.13. While employers are obliged to pay
those staff for the one day a week they spend in academic training, this is
more than made up for by the government grants available for taking on
apprentices.
Experts warned that ministers risked “devaluing” the
apprenticeship brand in their efforts to hit an artificial political target. They
pointed out that there were only two million 16- to 18-year-olds in the
country, many of whom were still at school – making it hard to achieve the
Government’s aim even if it were desirable to do so.
“It is a mad and artificial political target which risks
undermining the reputation of apprenticeships,” said Professor Alison Wolf, who
chaired a Government review into vocational education in 2011. “What the
Government should be doing is concentrating on those high-value apprenticeships
which teach vocational skills in manufacturing and engineering which
historically Britain has been bad at fostering. The danger is that money and
resources is put into hitting a meaningless numerical target.”
“The political narrative and the reality of what is
happening in apprenticeships are quite far apart from one another,” said Naomi
Weir, the Campaign for Science and Engineering group’s acting director. “The
political narrative is about high-level, technical, graduate-equivalent
apprenticeships whereas the reality is that there are only a few thousand of
across the whole apprenticeship system. That is not a viable alternative to
university. It could be but there needs to be a lot of effort to get us into a
position of having a high-level technical system that we need to run alongside
higher education.”
No comments:
Post a Comment