Saturday, May 31, 2025

German stupidity

 

So the German state continues to up the ante in its apparent desire to enter into a direct war with Russia. Not alone but with the help of its NATO mates.

We could speculate that the time specified, 2029, when the ‘potential threat’ from Russia is anticipated is one when there may be a new President in the USA who is far more amenable than the current holder to throwing America’s military might into the mix too.

However, a week is a long time in politics as they say and with the decision to provide Ukraine with longer range missiles capable of hitting Moscow the German state might very well discover it has bitten off more than it can chew.

What of the German majority class, and that of other western European countries, including the UK, what say do they get in all of this warmongering and potentially devastating consequences?

Peace rallies and CND protests are unlikely to prevent the actions which so called ‘leaders’ have embarked upon. The support for war determined states by the various military-industrial complexes is obviously a given.

The Legacy Media is already drip drip feeding of propaganda designed to put fear into the hearts of its various populaces. Is it likely or unlikely that we may see compulsory two minute hatred with venom being directed at Putin or whoever might be the Russian leader after him?

Even if a resolution to the current conflict is achieved, and a European security architecture is agreed, what guarantee is there that a threat to world safety won’t break out again?

The majority class should not let any more time pass before it says enough is enough. There is only one solution to this and many other existing problems and that is the replacement of capitalism with the only sane alternative, socialism.

The German military must significantly increase its weapons stockpile by 2029, the year the current government anticipates a potential threat from Russia, according to a directive issued by the country’s defence chief, obtained by Reuters.

The order, titled ‘Directive Priorities for the Bolstering of Readiness’, was signed on May 19 by Carsten Breuer, the inspector general of the Bundeswehr, the news agency reported.

Breuer’s order emphasises the procurement of advanced air defence systems and long-range precision strike capabilities effective at ranges exceeding 500km. He has also reportedly directed the military to increase the stockpiling of various types of ammunition and to develop new capacities in electronic warfare, as well as space-based systems for both defensive and offensive missions.

In March, the German parliament amended the nation’s law to exempt military spending from the ‘debt brake’, a measure that limits government borrowing. Merz has proposed allocating up to 5% of the nation’s GDP to security-related projects by 2032, a significant increase from the current level of around 2%. He claimed that this expenditure would transform the Bundeswehr into Europe’s most formidable military force.

The rearmament plans necessitate a corresponding increase in personnel. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius indicated in a recent interview that the ruling coalition aims to introduce a recruitment model similar to Sweden’s, potentially ending the current volunteer-only system as early as next year.

Friday, May 30, 2025

SPGB Meeting TONIGHT 30 May 1930 (GMT +1) ZOOM

 

RECENT PARTY ACTIVITY (ZOOM)


Event Details

  • Date:  – 

Recent Party activity — local elections, stalls at events and radical bookfairs.
Lessons and future such activity

To connect to a Zoom meeting, click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Peace off

 

In April, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported an ‘unprecedented’ 9.4% rise in worldwide military spending last year, making 2024 the tenth year of successive increases. In response, SIPRI sponsored a “Forum on Peace and Development” in May, which featured “high-level panels and roundtables as well as a range of workshops, spotlights, exhibitions and fireside chats”.

Reassured? Don’t be.

Because capital, privately owned or state-controlled, will always require some part of the wealth that we workers produce to be squandered on preparations for and commission of fresh slaughters. Not for freedom, democracy or nationhood, but to protect markets, sources of raw materials and trade routes.

So if you want world peace, you need to help prepare for world socialism.


https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/



Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Socialist Sonnet No. 194

Tarnished Idols

 

It used to be mardy gods unleashing

Thunderbolts from the skies, but they have been

Superseded by those who are between

Demagogues and demiurges, ceasing

To regard common humanity

As other than expendable. They see

Themselves as supreme dealers of destiny,

Prime moulders of nationalist vanity.

Drones and missiles are their bolts from the blue,

Striking schools, hospitals, apartment blocks,

Rendered to ruin by reasoning that mocks

Reason, by insisting the lie is true.

Not by sanction, reprisal nor moral force

Can leaders be led to a change of course.

 

D. A.

Polish eye cake


Shock horror, a politician tells the honest unadulterated truth! Irish republican James Connolly said that "governments in capitalist society are but committees of the rich to manage the affairs of the capitalist class.'' Donald Tusk, leader of the Polish committee for the same has unequivocally laid out the intention of the Polish capitalist class to grab a slice of the pie, as big a slice as possible, from the reconstruction of war devastated Ukraine. He recognises that Poland won’t be the only capitalist state fighting over the profit creating opportunities this would provide. In capitalist system and under capitalist psychology of cause it isn’t wrong to want to earn big money wherever and whenever possible. It’s the nature of the system. You might as well try to dissuade a pack of spotted hyenas from dismembering their prey. If an analogy between hyenas and capitalism is inferred we may perhaps owe hyenas an apology.

Poland intends to profit from Ukraine’s post-conflict reconstruction, Prime Minister Donald Tusk has said.

During a visit to the Euroterminal Slawkow railway facility Tusk pitched the expansion of the site into a key hub for materials bound for Ukraine.

“It is not wrong to say: we want to earn big money for Poland on the reconstruction of Ukraine,” he told reporters. “We want to help, but we also want to earn money on it, and this special hub is needed for this purpose.”

Poland has been one of Ukraine’s top donors since the conflict with Russia escalated in 2022, providing over €5.1 billion ($5.7 billion) in aid – more than 70% of it military – according to Germany’s Kiel Institute. Warsaw is also part of the so-called “coalition of the willing,” a group of European nations advocating continued military aid for Kiev. Polish officials have repeatedly urged EU-wide militarisation in response to what they describe as a growing threat from Russia – claims that Moscow has repeatedly dismissed as “nonsense” and “fearmongering.”

The Euroterminal Slawkow, established in 2010, lies near the intersection of Pan-European Transport Corridors III and VI. It currently supports regular connections within Poland, Lithuania, Germany, Italy, and several Ukrainian locations. According to Tusk, the terminal has the potential to become a major transshipment centre, thanks to its location at the junction of rail lines linking Western Europe with Ukraine and Asia.

Tusk complained about Poland’s minimal role in reconstruction efforts after the Iraq War, insisting that the country will not be sidelined again.

“It cannot be like it used to be... where everyone got involved, including Poland, and then the bigger players made money on the reconstruction, and Poland was left out in the cold,” he said.

“If we are talking about tens, hundreds of billions of zloty that the world, Europe, Poland, Ukraine will spend on the reconstruction, then among other things we are expanding this logistics hub... so that Poland can make money on it,” he concluded.

The World Bank estimates that Ukraine’s recovery could cost more than $500 billion over the next decade.’


Monday, May 26, 2025

Cucumbers

 

Would our Polish or East European readers educate us on the importance of the cucumber in Polish food recipes? The cucumber is a fruit, grown from flowers of plant and has seeds, but is commonly called a vegetable because of its use in food, Whether the cucumber is a ‘marmite’ type of food or not is down to individual taste.

It has now become the centre of a furore between Poles and Russians. Polish farmers want to see Russian cucumbers sanctioned. Not for the reasons that many sanctions already exist on all kinds of Russian commodities and services because it is a ‘punishment’ on the Russians for the conflict between it and Ukraine. The uproar on the part of the Poles is based upon a good old capitalist reason – unfair competition. Presumably, those Polish consumers who love to use cucumbers in their culinary endeavours don’t care where the fruit comes from if it saves them money when purchased.

Polish capitalist cucumber farmers care greatly about their profits and that concern overrides any benefit to consumers when it comes to cheaper food.

Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, in 1855, ‘If a man has good corn or wood, or boards, or pigs, to sell, or can make better chairs or knives, crucibles or church organs, than anybody else, you will find a broad hard-beaten road to his house, though it be in the woods.The reaction of Poles to more expensive cucumbers, should Polish producers get their way, will be interesting to observe.

Being capitalism someone should inform Polish producers that instead of bitching they should be looking to produce cucumbers on a par with, or cheaper than, the Russian ones. Poles gripe that Russians benefit from cheaper energy, and thus reduced production costs .It was their ‘leaders’, along with many others in Western Europe, who brought about this situation through the sanctioning of Russia energy. Faff around, find out as the saying goes.

We, of course, hold no torch for any of the participants in this spat. Whether it’s cucumbers or any other commodity w,hich is produced to be sold and realise the surplus value involved in the production, profit is the name of the game. So whether the capitalists are Poles, Russians, or whoever, we say a plague on your houses and look forward to the time when, with a free access society, such squabbles are no longer undertaken.

‘Polish cucumber producers have called for a ban on Russian imports after data revealed that Russia became the nation’s leading supplier in March, according to local media reports. Polish farmers claim that Russian producers benefit from lower energy costs, allowing them to sell products at cheaper prices.

While overall Russian agricultural exports to the EU fell by 79% year-on-year in January 2025, shipments of fresh cucumbers from Russia rose sharply, according to Eurostat data. In Poland in particular, deliveries reached a four-year high in the spring.

Lukasz Gwizdala, the operations director of the Polish Association of Tomato and Cucumber Producers, claimed last week that the influx of Russian cucumbers has disrupted the domestic market. He stated that Polish farmers have urged the government to ban imports of the vegetable amid record supply levels.

Over 2,000 tons, worth €2.7 million ($3.07 million), entered Poland in March – 2.5 times more than in February and 25% higher than in March 2024, RIA Novosti reported last week, citing Eurostat data. The export value was the highest since March 2021, when sales reached €3.1 million. Of the €3.25 million Poland spent on cucumber imports in March, 83% came from Russia, making Poland the leading EU importer of Russian cucumbers, the figures showed.

Polish farmers argue they are facing unfair competition from Russian producers, as heating greenhouses to grow tomatoes and cucumbers requires fuel, which has become significantly more expensive over the past three years.

“The Russians have access to their own energy resources, and as a result, lower production costs,” Gwizdala told the outlet. “When they sell their products in Poland, we are dealing with unfair competition because we have limited access to cheap energy.”

The EU has imposed multiple sanctions targeting Russian energy exports since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. The restrictions have led to a rapid rise in energy prices and production costs for energy-intensive industries within the bloc, hitting various sectors including greenhouse agriculture.

Gwizdala said his association is now in talks with the agriculture and environment ministries, pushing for an EU-wide embargo on cucumber and tomato imports from Russia and Belarus, with a decision possible within the next two months.

Last year, Sergey Dankvert, head of Russian agricultural watchdog Rosselkhoznadzor, told RBK that lower gas prices make Russian greenhouse vegetables cheaper than those in the EU. He predicted that with costly US LNG, European products risk losing their competitiveness while Russian exports gain market share.'


Saturday, May 24, 2025

Capitalism Censorship and War Threats

 

Microsoft is reportedly under fire from employees following claims that its internal email system blocks messages containing terms such as “Gaza,” “Palestine,” and “Genocide.” The restrictions, reported by The Verge, have sparked accusations of censorship and discrimination, particularly amid mounting criticism of the company’s ties to Israel.

The claims come from No Azure for Apartheid (NOAA), a protest group of current and former Microsoft workers. The group says “dozens of employees” have been unable to send emails internally or externally if these words appear in subject lines or message bodies.

In contrast, words such as “Israel” or alternate spellings like “P4lestine” are reportedly not filtered. “This is an attempt to silence worker free speech,” said NOAA organizer Hossam Nasr, who accused Microsoft’s leadership of discriminating against Palestinian employees and their supporters.

Microsoft confirmed that it had made email-related changes aimed at reducing internal political messaging. A company spokesperson said the measures were taken to limit mass political emails, noting that “emailing large numbers of employees about non-work topics is not appropriate” and that such communication should go through opt-in forums.

The controversy comes amid ongoing protests over Microsoft’s cloud and AI contracts with Israel, which media reports say support military operations in Gaza. While the US company has acknowledged working with the Israeli government, it claimed in a May 16 statement that “no evidence” has emerged showing its tools have been used to cause harm—though it also admitted it lacks visibility into how its software is deployed on private systems.

The internal dissent has played out publicly in recent weeks. At the Microsoft Build developer conference, employee Joe Lopez interrupted CEO Satya Nadella’s keynote speech, accusing the company of enabling war crimes. Lopez was later fired after sending a mass email to thousands of staff members calling for action.’


The chance of an Israeli military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities “has gone up significantly” in recent months, CNN reported citing multiple US officials familiar with new intelligence assessments.

While Israeli leadership has not made a final decision, recently intercepted communications suggest that planning is actively underway, unnamed sources have told the network.

US intelligence has also noted Israeli military activities, including the movement of air munitions and the completion of air exercises, which could indicate preparations for an “imminent strike.”

Several officials acknowledged that these actions might serve as a strategic signal to Iran, aiming to pressure Tehran into concessions during ongoing negotiations with Washington. However, one source cited by CNN warned that “the prospect of a Trump-negotiated US-Iran deal that doesn’t remove all of Iran’s uranium makes the chance of a strike more likely.”

US President Donald Trump tore up the 2015 UN-backed agreement on Iran’s nuclear program during his first term in office. He accused Tehran of secretly violating the deal and reimposed sanctions.

Iran responded by rolling back its own compliance with the accord and accelerated its enrichment of uranium. Since returning to the White House, Trump has been pressuring Tehran into a new agreement and has even threatened to bomb the country if a deal isn’t reached.

Iran and Israel exchanged strikes in April and October of last year, marking the most dramatic escalation between the regional rivals.

Earlier this year, Israel reportedly proposed “an extensive bombing campaign to knock out Iranian nuclear facilities, according to the New York Times, but Trump refused to back it, opting instead to pursue diplomacy. Since then, according to Reuters, West Jerusalem has been considering a more limited strike that would require minimal US support.

Despite the belligerent rhetoric, the US and Iran have held several rounds of talks in Oman in recent months, which have been described by both sides as constructive and productive. However, Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, stated that while Washington wants to resolve the standoff with Tehran diplomatically, it has “one very, very clear red line… We cannot allow even 1% of an enrichment capability.”

Iran currently enriches uranium to 60% purity, far above the 3.67% cap set under the now-defunct nuclear deal and close to the 90% needed for weapons-grade material. While US and Israeli officials have for years warned that Tehran is just weeks away from a nuclear breakthrough, the Islamic Republic insists that its nuclear program is peaceful and not aimed at producing a bomb.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed the US demand to fully dismantle its nuclear facilities as “unrealistic,” saying Tehran would continue enriching uranium with or without a deal. He also suggested that some statements by US officials are “completely detached from the reality of negotiations.” ‘






Friday, May 23, 2025

SPGB Meeting TONIGHT 23 May 1930 (GMT +1) ZOOM


WHO IS WORKING CLASS ?

Speaker: Kevin Cronin 
Focussing on the USA and its history in terms of how sections of the working class there become divided from other elements on the basis of ‘identity politics’ and are then used to promote the interests of capitalism there. To connect to a Zoom meeting, click https://zoom.us/


Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Socialist Sonnet No. 193

Class Consciousness

 

In the reign of King Coal and Queen cotton

Class seemed clear, the sons and daughters of toil,

Drawn to industrial towns from the soil,

Knew precisely where all the ill-gotten

Gains from their labours went. To the mansion

Up on the hill, wherein dwelt the owner

Of all gathered below him, the loner

Being driven by capital’s expansion.

That dual monarchy has abdicated,

The mansion’s now a care home. Workers pass,

Too many are convinced, as middle class,

Though capital’s craving must still be sated.

Commodity dealers remain takers

Of profit, from commodity makers.

 

D. A.

No surprises from Labour

 

Many Labour Party supporters are disappointed and dispirited at the way its government is managing the system. They didn’t expect benefit cuts, ramped up anti-migrant measures and promises of no tax increases for the wealthy. As usual, any principles Labour professes when out of office go out the window once they win power and are faced with the need to keep the anarchic system of capitalism afloat.

We shouldn’t be surprised. Trying to run a system based on trade, wages, profit, and the unpredictable market is bound to leave you flailing. It needs to be replaced by a moneyless, frontierless society of free access – socialism. But the Labour Party never has been and never can be an instrument for that.

https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/


Monday, May 19, 2025

How much longer?

 

On the day when a telephone call is taking place between President Trimp, USA, and President Putin, Russian Federation, to supposedly ‘resolve’ the conflict between Ukraine and Russia in which thousands have been killed or mutilated the conflict between Israel and Palestine continues to result in the deaths of many. In Palestine the casualties appear to adversely affect civilians.

A nineteen sixties singer sang of the Universal Soldier which posits that without individuals of various states being willing to serve in the military and give their bodies as weapons of war then wars would not be possible.

The song also also lays the blame upon general populations saying that they are now responsible for giving the orders to those willing to fight.

The SPGB has, since its inception, condemned war and has explained often the underlying reasons for armed conflict within a capitalist system.

With the West (so-called ‘leaders’ that is, not general populations) apparently determined to set itself on a course of war with Russia in the not too distant future, with the prospect of nuclear weapons being used and the devastating effect for humanity that would have, then the question has to be begged as to why the majority continue to allow this state of affairs to continue?

Al Jazeera reports, ‘Israel carries out at least 30 air strikes within an hour in Gaza’s south, killing at least 70 Palestinians across the war-battered enclave since dawn.

Israeli military has issued forced displacement order for Khan Younis, Gaza’s second-largest city, as its assault escalates.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office says it will allow a limited amount of aid into Gaza, but it’s not clear when the supplies will enter the enclave.Israel’s war on Gaza has killed at least 53,339 Palestinians and wounded 121,034, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.

The Government Media Office updated the death toll to more than 61,700, saying thousands of people missing under the rubble are presumed dead. An estimated 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the Hamas-led attacks on October 7, 2023, and more than 200 were taken captive.’

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/5/19/live-israel-kills-144-palestinians-targets-north-gaza-hospital




Friday, May 16, 2025

SPGB Meeting TONIGHT 16 May 1930 (GMT +1) ZOOM

DEMOCRACY AND THE SOCIAL REPUBLIC (ZOOM)


Event Details

  • Date:  – 

Speaker: Darren Poynton
Some thoughts on the transformation of the state

To connect to a Zoom meeting, click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Trebles all round

'Capitalism seems to have descended from tragedy into farce. Trump climbs down yet again from adolescent posturing and cuts the China tariff by 115%. Qatar soothes and flatters him with a free 747 ‘flying palace’ for his presidential toy cupboard.

In a craven sop to Reform UK, Labour plans to ‘get tough’ on legal migration, despite its known advantages for the economy, and a looming demographic crisis. Who needs facts and statistics when scapegoats are easier? Starmer and co are pandering to populist dog whistles.

Elsewhere, autocrats offer peace with one hand and lob missiles with the other.

The deaths pile up while the profits roll in, and the rich celebrate with cocktails on their floating palaces.'


https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/


Tuesday, May 13, 2025

1926 General Strike


On the 99th anniversary of the 1926 General Strike we look back to the piece below which was published in the May 2016 Socialist Standard on the 90th anniversary of the event.

On the 90th anniversary of the 1926 General Strike we look again at its lessons and at the uses and limitations of this class struggle tactic.

The General Strike lasted from 3 to 12 May in an attempt to defend the miners. It has been claimed that a significant proportion of the union leadership actually feared victory. ‘I am not in fear of the capitalist class. The only class I fear is my own,’ said J.R. Clynes of the General and Municipal Workers Union. Trade union leaders were not going to challenge the state even though as the strike continued, more and more control over the day-to-day functioning of society passed into the hands of the strikers. The TUC General Council betrayed every resolution upon which the strike call was issued and without a single concession being gained. The miners were left to fight the mine-owners, backed by the government, on their own.

Most commentators agree that the strength of the strike came from the solidarity of the grass-roots mass support and the weakness from above by an indecisive bureaucracy. ‘There’s never been anything like it. If the blighters o' leaders here dinnae let us down we’ll hae the capitalists crawlin’ on their bellies in a week. Oh boy, it’s the revolution at last,’ said one striker in Glasgow. Revolution was exactly what the trade union leaders didn't want. The General Strike had opened a Pandora's Box and in the words of NUR leader Charlie Cramp — ‘Never again!’ and said Ben Turner of the TUC General Council: ‘I never want to see another.’ The trade union activists' shock at the call-off was only matched by the employers' and government's unexpected surprise.  ‘A victorious army disarmed and handed over to its enemies,’ declared another Glasgow striker.

What We Said

The Socialist Party realistically understood that there was no immediate question of revolution. We favoured the general strike for the limited objective of exerting massive pressure upon employers to concede over pay or conditions. We had advocated:

 ‘. . . combined action by the workers to resist the wholesale onslaught by the masters upon wages and working conditions . . .  that the old sectional mode of industrial warfare was obsolete; that, while the development of industry had united the masters into giant combinations, with interests ramifying in every direction, supported at every point by the forces of the State, representing the entire capitalist class, the division among the workers, according to their occupations, led automatically to their steady defeat in detail. The only hope, even for the limited purpose of restricting the extent of the defeat, lay, therefore, in class combination... economic and political ignorance kept the workers divided and the defeats went on. Yet even worms will turn, and rats forced into corners will fight ...There is a limit even to the stupidity of sheep; and not all the smooth-tongued eloquence of their shepherds could prevent the flock from realising that they may as well hang together as hang separately.’

The Socialist Standard (June 1926) lamented the TUC's lack of strike plans:

As an expression of working-class solidarity the response of the rank and file was unquestionably unprecedented; but the long months, nay, years of delay found effect in the official confusion between ‘essential’ and non-essential occupations, the handling of goods by some unions which were banned by others and the issuing of permits one day which had to be withdrawn the next. Just prior to the strike the railwaymen were working overtime providing the companies with the coal to run their blackleg trains ...’

In particular, we urged the working class to learn the lessons of the General Strike:

 "The outlook before the workers is black, indeed, but not hopeless, if they will but learn the lessons of this greatest of all disasters. ‘Trust your leaders!" we were adjured in the Press and from the platforms of the Labour Party, and the folly of such sheep-like trust is now glaring. The workers must learn to trust only in themselves. They must themselves realise their position and decide the line of action to be taken. They must elect their officials to take orders, not to give them! ... It is useless for the workers either to ‘trust’ leaders or to ‘change’ them. The entire institution of leadership must be swept by the board." At the time we urged workers that they "must organise as a class, not merely industrially, for the capture of supreme power as represented by the political machine... The one thing necessary is a full recognition by the workers themselves of the hostility of interests between themselves and their masters. Organised on that basis, refusing to be tricked and bluffed by promises or stampeded into violence by threats, they will emerge victorious from the age-long struggle. Win Political Power! That is the first step.’

The general strike as a tactic

The possibility of a general strike keeps cropping up within the trade union movement. When we speak of the general strike we are not concerned with the general strike of a single trade union but of all workers. The movement is no longer a trade union movement but has become a class movement. For the general strike to succeed, the working-class must be convinced of the importance of the purpose for which it is declared. It must be shown that the aim is legitimate and victory is possible. The general strike cannot be a disguise for revolution, but simply the exercise of the right to strike on a wider scale and with a more clearly marked class character. The Socialist Party dismisses the idea that the general strike is a panacea for workers.

The idea of carrying through a social revolution by means of a ‘folded arms’ policy is romantic. A stoppage of production and transportation is not enough to bring about the overthrow of a society. Strikers will stand idly outside places of work, and even if the workers occupied and took possession of the factories and offices, it is a pointless exercise for they cannot function while the economy is suspended and production is stopped by the universal strike. So long as a class does not collectively own and control the whole social machine, it can seize all the factories and offices it wants to, but it really possesses nothing. The failure of a general strike involves real suffering, and discouraged and disconsolate, defeated strikers withdraw from the movement into passivity and apathy.  A general strike is ‘All or nothing!’ Workers should think twice about supporting such a gamble.

There are some who seek to transform a proposed general strike against austerity, for instance, into a political general strike, using the opposition to the cuts as the slogans to mobilise around. They expect that because of a sustained general strike the normal economic life of the country will be suspended, and there would be a total stoppage in distribution and in production. Naturally, workers would be forced to adopt more forceful methods in order to live. They would seize food and other provisions wherever they could lay hands on them. The ruling class would respond in kind with repression and so the general strike is envisaged to escalate into a revolutionary scenario. That is the idea of the ‘revolutionaries’. But this sort of strategy is a trick to delude the working-class. It proposes to drag them far beyond what was proposed. To imagine that a social revolution can result from misleading workers in such a manner is nonsense.

Although the general strike is quite powerless as a revolutionary means of liberation for the exploited class, nevertheless it is a potent warning to the capitalist class. It tells them if they are crazy enough to make the right to unite in trade unions and the right to strike empty forms, then a general strike may well be the shape that a labour revolt would take. It would be more as a means of damaging the enemy to save ourselves than a means of liberation. The trade union movement has proven itself to be a powerful instrument of a defensive character.

The strike weapon is the workers' only means of defence or attack which it has for the protection of its immediate material interests.  Working people are right to jealously guard the right to strike. While the Socialist Party fully supports this right for all workers, it is not our business to incite them to make use of it. It is not for us to urge or discourage strikes. It is for those immediately involved, those who will have to endure the consequences of their decision, to decide without pressure of any kind from outsiders. When those workers whose interests are at stake have decided upon a strike, other workers including socialists ought to aid them to gain every possible advantage from the situation in which they have placed themselves.

That is, generally speaking, what is and what should be the conduct of socialists so far as strikes are concerned. We acknowledge the strike as a weapon, but recognise that its effectiveness should not to be exaggerated and that it possesses limited power. Under favourable circumstances it may compel some employers to yield to union demands but it has never been able to produce any radical change in the capitalist system. Here or there some ameliorations have been achieved but they have not been incompatible with the increasing prosperity of capital.

The political expropriation of the capitalist class today is its economic expropriation tomorrow. To win for socialism the greatest possible number of partisans, that is the task to which the Socialist Party concentrates its efforts. What is necessary is to make socialists, to bring people's wills into harmony with a movement that seeks the election of more and more socialists to our various elective assemblies. The political expropriation of the capitalist class today can be its economic expropriation tomorrow and the transformation of wage labour to the free association of workers and common ownership.’

ALJO

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2016/05/the-general-strike-weapon-of-class-war.html


Monday, May 12, 2025

History lesson

 

Lessons to be learnt from history.

In November 1912 a piece in the Socialist Standard dealt with conflict in the Balkans.

To arms! To arms! Thus once again is the “Eastern Question” answered. Turk and Bulgarian, Mohammedan and Christian, are at one another’s throats in a frenzy of blood-lust. The clash of arms and the roar of guns once more shake the hills and mountains of the near East, and the cries of wounded and dying men fill fair valleys with horror. Montenegro was the first with its declaration of war—a country with under 250,000 inhabitants—not, in that respect, the equal of the London suburb, West Ham—and as poor as the oft-quoted church mouse. Where did she get her armaments? Bulgaria, Servia, Greece, every one of them poor—who backed them and why?

Why did Russia take up the Montenegrin war loan? Why did “The Powers” take up the Bulgarian loan? Were they moved to do so by the promptings of humanity? Read the cynical answer in the story of past wars.

Japan fought Russia for the forests of Manchuria. Korea helped Japan—now Korea belongs to Japan. The United States fought Spain ostensibly on the ground of the Cuban “horrors”, and the Yankee Eagle has his beak in the hearts of the Cubans and the Phillipinos.

The English Government “sought neither gold nor territory” in South Africa, but the Transvaal and the Orange Free State went the way of Zululand and the Basutos’ country—and it was the wrongs of the Uitlanders, who hadn’t got the vote, that justified the war!

Every brutal and bloody gang of rulers, sitting armed on the backs of their groaning, bleeding and starving multitudes, have sobbed and slobbered and shed crocodile’s tears over the suffering subjects of the Sultan. Austria was so shocked by the miseries of the poor people of Bosnia and Herzegovina that she had to soothe her feelings by “annexing” both these countries. Britain also has been sorely troubled over the horrors perpetrated in the Ottoman Empire, so the Cross relieved the Crescent of Egypt and Cyprus. Russia wrung her hands in agony, and then laid them on Bessarabia. That monument to Garibaldi’s genius, A United Italy, itched to stop the villainies of the Porte, so she seized Tripoli at the admitted cost of 9,000 Italian workers’ lives, and goodness knows what cost to “the enemy”, if we are to believe the Italian boasts of slaughter.

Have we answered the question of why this war? It is the old story of Grab! The monopolists of the means of life are out for plunder…

The world’s financiers, the world’s brigands, are seeking wider fields for exploitation. The owners of the New World are grasping at the old. Bulgarian peasants, Servian toilers, Grecian slaves, are to sacrifice their lives to provide plunder for the moneyed tyrannies of Europe. Women of our class are to be widowed, children to be orphaned, homes to be desolated, to make a masters’ holiday. Hence the war fever is aroused, religious rivalries stirred up, racial hatreds and jealousies fanned to fury by judicious but unscrupulous lying—and all that Macedonia may go the way of Persia...The lesson of it all for the workers is that nothing in the world is sacred that stands in the way of capitalist aggrandisement—which is spelt: “Profits”. In pursuit of profits no crime is too stupendous to be undertaken.'

https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/1910s/1912/no-99-november-1912/balkan-conspiracy/

As the French have it, ‘plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose’, the more things change the more they stay the same.




Friday, May 09, 2025

WSM New Website

  

"The World Socialist Movement has a new website that presents the basic argument for world socialism. The site can be accessed at http://www.worldsocialist.org 

Currently in English and Spanish, the new site will, in future, include other major languages. 

It is designed for newcomers to real socialist ideas. 

Could readers please advertise this new site as widely as possible on social media and elsewhere using the link https://www.worldsocialist.org/?mtm_campaign=spgb"



Losing species


A synthesis of a large number of biological studies has shown that humans are responsible for high levels of biodiversity loss (Guardian 26 March).

This decline is driven by a number of factors, namely habitat change, direct exploitation of resources, climate change, invasive species and pollution. This includes use of pesticides, for example.

A Professor of Ecology noted that many species have key roles, such as pollination and seed dispersal. They need larger populations and genetic diversity so they can continue to evolve and perform their functions that keep the ecosystem going.

Of course it is capitalism, with its profit motive and drive to expand, that is responsible for such degradation.


https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/

SPGB Meeting TONIGHT 9 May 1930 (GMT+1) ZOOM

 

THE SUPPRESSION OF THE MARKET? FOOD CONTROL IN WW1 BRITAIN (ZOOM)


Event Details

  • Date:  – 

Speaker: Bill Martin

To connect to a Zoom meeting, click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305

Thursday, May 08, 2025

Peace in our time?

 

Victory in Europe, the end of the Second World War is remembered in the West on 8 May. In Russia, and former Soviet states, Victory Day is remembered on 9 May. The present conflict between Ukraine and Russia has had the President of Ukraine implying that in war, Russia designates the conflict as a Special Military Operation, anything goes and he has openly threatened to attack the Victory day ‘celebrations’ taking place in Moscow.

Politicians and ‘leaders’ who, in May of 1945 or thereafter, may have channelled the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, who returned from a meeting with Adolf Hitler, the German Chancellor, after signing the Munich Agreement, waving a piece of paper and proclaiming peace in our time! Would have been either naïve, disingenuous or lacking in understanding in understanding of capitalism and its determination to seek competitive advantage and the increase of power and profits through any means possible. As the American General Smedley D. Butler wrote, War is a racket!

We now have an additional conflict added to the ones now currently taking place. To Ukraine-Russia, USA-Yemen, USA-Iran (possible future one), Israel -various Middle East states, Pakistan and India, both nuclear states, have just engaged in escalating tensions.

A search of Wiki shows that major conflicts between these two states took place in 1947-48, 1965, 1971, 1999 and now 2025. There have been many minor skirmishes along the way.

Since 1945 there have been many other serious or minor conflicts taking place all across the world. ‘Peace’ and ‘capitalism’ put together is an oxymoron. Who seriously believes that real peace will ever descend upon the world whilst the exploitative profit chasing capitalist system continues to exist?

The below is from the Socialist Standard May 1985.

‘VE Day in Britain was a typically bright and sunny late spring day, cloaked in a certain air of unreality. It had been obvious for several weeks that Germany was collapsing and that the war in Europe was drawing to a close. Hitler was dead and it was just a matter of time before the end. Over the radio came a stream of announcements in German, accompanied by martial music, that were later revealed to be false messages put out to spread confusion in a Germany that was sinking into chaos. In fact the choice of day was bungled. It had been intended to announce the final surrender on 9 May—the day the surrender was to be ratified at a stage-managed ceremony in Berlin—but the news was leaked by an American reporter and so the Western powers celebrated a day earlier. 

People went through a repeat performance of 1918. Church bells were rung, floodlights were turned on, there was dancing in the streets and street parties, and the usual crowds outside Buckingham Palace. The mood was more realistic than in 1918. Just as in September 1939 there had been an absence of the hysteria of 1914, so in 1945 there were no wild expectations. People had at least learned enough to realise that this was not going to be a World Fit for Heroes and there was a complete absence of the Hang the Kaiser type of nonsense, the overwhelming feelings were of relief and concern about what lay ahead. After all, the first World War had only ended 27 years before, so people in early middle life could clearly remember what had followed it: a brief period of full employment and a slump that lasted, with fluctuations, until 1939. During all that time there were never less than a million unemployed, which served to keep down workers' wages, and even those who were children in the 1920s had vivid memories of the heroes of yesterday, often minus limbs, singing and playing for money in the streets. In 1945 prophesies were rife that there would be a couple of million unemployed, and war with Japan still had some time to run. 

Wartime censorship was still in operation and decisions which were to shape future events hidden from the public. People who had grown up with the concept of an "Empire on which the sun never sets" had no idea that in not much more than a generation only a few distant outposts would remain. And while Hamburg and Dresden were in the past, the dropping of the atom bomb was still to come: an event that would make total annihilation a possibility. But perhaps the most important unknown fact was the deterioration of the relationship with Russia. 

This latter was to present the authorities with one of their most difficult problems that of convincing people that those gallant, smiling heroic soldiers were in fact a menace to be feared. But they had had practice in such things in 1941, when they had to undo the propaganda efforts of the previous two years. From the signing of the Non-Aggression 'Pact with Germany just before the outbreak of war, through the invasion of eastern Poland and the attack on Finland, the Soviet Union was portrayed as a tyranny. The British Communist Party opposed the war and the Daily Worker was suppressed. When, in June 1941, the Germans invaded Russia, a complete change around took place. The propaganda machine was turned on full blast and for four years everything Russian became not only fashionable, but admirable. Russian faces looked down from hoardings and out from our news papers and magazines, Russian tunes poured from the radio, with dance-band singers trying to sound like Cossacks. while Russian films drew long queues to the box office. Russia was portrayed as a kind of democracy, different from the West but still a democracy. Joseph Stalin was really a kindly old chap who smoked a pipe and had a sense of humour. The purges and show trials were portrayed as being aimed solely at Nazi Fifth Columnists. The Daily Worker was restored and used the same strip cartoons that had opposed the war to support it. 

But on VE Day the public were blissfully unaware of this and Russian flags were carried with the Union Jack and the Stars and Stripes. The media—newspapers and magazines, radio and films—consciously sought to create a feeling that the war had blown away much that was stuffy and stale and that we were about to emerge into an exciting new world. This had started quite abruptly at the end of 1940 after the collapse of France and the beginning of the Blitz. With no introduction or build-up, just as if they had turned on a tap, the authorities started to talk about a new world. This was not the crude old stuff of the 1914-18 war, but much more subtle. Committees were set up and reports were issued covering every aspect of the economy. The most famous was the Beveridge Plan which, even from a capitalist point of view, hardly merited the claim to be "the hope of salvation for the future of the people of this country". However the propaganda machine pushed it until it became part of modern folklore. Planning Boards were set up for the development of town and country and to prevent the ugliness of pre-war urban sprawl. The bombing had laid bare large areas of the City of London and grandiose schemes were drawn up to lay these out with wide boulevards and open up a vista of St. Paul's from the Thames, with gardens and walks. But capitalism does not allow some of the most expensive land in the world to become flowerbeds. The result can be seen today in the City's forest of gigantic office blocks. 

Alongside this, throughout the war, every effort was made to encourage discussion and education as a morale booster, and to allay the boredom of the troops who during the build-up to D Day had been kept in comparative inaction. Radio programmes like the Brains Trust and the lunch-time concerts in an empty National Gallery were part of this, as was the effort of the Army Bureau of Current Affairs, who sent out fortnightly pamphlets to Army units for discussion. One result of this was to produce a swing to the Left in political thinking, which helped to produce the Labour victory at the 1945 General Election. 

During the war a political truce had prevailed and government was by coalition, on VE Day the truce was still intact but behind the scenes it was breaking up. Party leaders began to make veiled political speeches and after VE Day a General Election was called. This took place on 5 July but the count was delayed until 25 July to allow time for postal votes from the Armed Forces to come in. It was a quiet affair conducted on an out-of-date register and it resulted in a sweeping Labour victory. This was greeted by exaggerated hopes and fears. The Left saw it as the beginning of socialism which would sweep away the problems of the world, while some of the sillier Tories feared that they would be dispossessed, or at least lose their savings. Neither fears nor hopes were justified as all the Labour government could do was to run the country in the interest of the British capitalist class. Not that they had the slightest intention of doing anything else.

The Conservative Party were badly shaken by their defeat. For twenty years they had had things their own way; they had undoubtedly lost touch with grassroots feelings and their organisation had become obsolete. After a period of sulking because the electorate had had the cheek to throw them out, they began a steady climb back. They did what they would have shunned before the war and went out on to the streets. We were treated to the sight of top Tories slumming and ex-Cabinet Ministers were prepared to debate with anybody. They even found a few Tory working men who could be relied on to drop their aitches at the right place and address Tory women delegates in flowered hats as "mate". They went over big with the well-heeled delegates at the annual conference. Once they began to pick up again, the Tories dropped all this kind of stuff.

The Labour government began with a massive programme of nationalisation, which they called socialism, and found it difficult to get the British economy going again after the war. They gradually became more and more unpopular. Fascism had been discredited during the war but was soon to rear its ugly head again. 

There is no doubt that many men coming back from active service were determined that their children should grow up in a better world and that what they saw as the errors of the past should not be repeated. Unfortunately it was the inevitable workings of capitalism with which they were dealing. Slowly this political interest faded and for some years, once the immediate post war shortages had eased. things on the surface appeared much improved. Mass unemployment did not appear for many years and during the "never had it so good" era many people thought that the world had learned how to deal with such things as slumps. There were other problems of capitalism, principally the chronic housing shortage. People had jobs but nowhere decent to live. Love on the Dole was replaced by Cathy Come Home—and In Which We Serve by The War Game.’

Les Dale

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2015/07/they-called-it-peace-1985.html