It is becoming increasingly apparent that food and
agriculture across the world is in crisis. Last year saw the leaders of the
world come together in Paris for the summit on climate change, where, various
proposals were agreed upon to cut down on each country's respective carbon
footprint. However, the effects of climate change are not just limited to the
melting of glaciers. They reach out far and wide and even affect food
production. Climate change is an ever-growing concern in the world. Melting
glaciers and ice sheets, rising pollution levels, deforestation, etc., all
contribute or are reflective of the very fact that global warming and/or
climate change is, after all, very much real.
Climate change could kill half a million people globally,
and more than a hundred thousand in India over the next 35 years. China will
see even more deaths than India because of changes in agriculture and food
consumption with the climate-related deaths expected to be 248,000.
A future without climate change in which increases in food
availability and consumption could have prevented 1.9 million deaths. But the socialist
case goes so much further and attributes hunger to the economic social system
we live under. A minority of the global population has access to so much food
than it can afford to waste much of it, while food poverty and inequality have
become a fact of life for hundreds of millions. Agriculture and food production
and distribution have become globalised and tied to an international system of
trade based on export-oriented mono-cropping, commodity production for the
international market.
One of the most popular terms used today to describe food
production is “stewardship”. However, that term is more than a buzzword. It is all about that important goal to strive daily to
help feed and clothe nearly 7.4 billion people worldwide through the careful,
sustainable use of water, land, air and other resources. Only a socialist society can guarantee such a world.
No comments:
Post a Comment