Typical
household incomes in the UK will not grow for the next two years due
to the "long shadow" of the 2008 financial crisis, the
Institute for Fiscal Studies predicts.
The IFS report on living standards for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation suggests, based on official forecasts produced for the government by the Office for Budget Responsibility, that long-term income growth is a relatively slow 2% a year.
"If
the OBR's forecast for earnings growth is correct, average incomes
will not increase at all over the next two years," said Tom Waters, an author of the report. "Even if earnings do much
better than expected over the next few years, the long shadow cast by
the financial crisis will not have receded."
This
was generally the result of small increases in wages, low
productivity levels, tax and benefit policies and the state of the UK
economy. The squeeze would be felt worst by low-income households
with children, he said, owing primarily to the four-year freeze in
working-age benefits.
Campbell
Robb, chief executive of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said: "These
troubling forecasts show millions of families across the country are
teetering on a precipice, with 400,000 pensioners and over one
million more children likely to fall into poverty."
The IFS projects that the number of children in relative poverty, defined as those in a family earning less than 60 per cent of median incomes after housing costs, will rise by 900,000 to 5.1 million by 2021-22.
That is almost 36 per cent of all children.
The think tank also projects that the number of children in absolute poverty, those earning less than 60 per cent of 2010-11 real median incomes, will rise by 600,000.
That is 30 per cent of the total.
Imran Hussain, director of policy for the Child Poverty Action Group, said: “There is no greater burning injustice than children being forced into poverty as a result of government policy. Decisions which have made real-terms cuts to basic benefits for children, the low paid and the disabled have led to us rationing our decency as a country. At the same time, the better off have been the overwhelmingly beneficiaries of increases to personal tax allowances worth billions.
No comments:
Post a Comment