Yet another post revealing the dire state of democracy and accountancy in Haiti.
The World Bank, the Haitian government, and international
mining company representatives walk into a hotel lobby to discuss the future of
mining in Haiti. A two-hour gathering was held in a luxury hotel to assess a
100-page document which was a draft mining law stipulating how the Haitian
government expects to deal with companies that want to begin extracting the
estimated $20 billion worth of gold and minerals that is believed to lie in the
mountains to the north.
This investor-friendly mining bill would replace a
decades-old convention that has stymied foreign exploration of the country's
untapped mineral deposits. The document is consistent with the President Michel
Martelly administration's slogan, "Haiti is open for business,"
welcoming an influx of foreign capital that would bring much-needed tax
revenues and new jobs to the struggling country — but at the risk of
significant social and environmental cost.
The draft mining law was written with assistance from the
World Bank, which supports the Haitian operations of Canadian mining company
Eurasian Minerals through its private-sector investment arm, the International
Finance Cooperation. The World Bank became involved in redrafting the Haitian
mining convention in 2013, and has worked in close consultation with North
American mining companies that have already secured mining permits in Haiti. In
an effort to streamline the infusion of foreign investment, the draft contains
a number of provisions that Haitians are concerned will further marginalize
communities most affected by mining activity in the north.
For example, the
proposed law would formalize a 10-year confidentiality period for any
"reports, documents and data pertaining to… work undertaken within the
context of a mining title," including geological discoveries or
topographical information gleaned in the course of mining operations.
The draft law makes it easier for the government to
expropriate land to enable mining installations if they are deemed to be in the
"public interest." As the complaint notes, the bill "does not
make clear whether landowners and land users have the right to refuse to allow
mining companies to enter onto and use their land."
According to the draft law, the country's Environment
Ministry will have 180 days to evaluate a company's environmental assessment of
a given project in its application for a mining permit. Six months might seem
like a reasonable amount of time, but complainants point to the inefficiency of
Haitian governmental bureaucracy getting in the way of timely assessments. They
fear that the cap will compromise the ministry's authority and inhibit critical
oversight of environmental concerns. A statement of "no objection"
will be assumed after the period lapses, allowing mining activities to proceed
regardless of any potential dangers.
Opponents argue that the bill's provisions fall short of
World Bank environmental safeguards that weigh a project's benefits against its
degradation of natural habitat. Critics bemoan the lack of clarity surrounding
the Environment Ministry's authority, and questions the adequacy of the
rehabilitation measures outlined in the bill. World Bank operational policies
require a discussion with "project-affected groups and local
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) about the project's environmental
aspects." They should be provided relevant material in a timely manner, in
a form and language that is "understandable and accessible." Between
90 to 95 percent of Haitians speak only Creole, so French-language documents
are useless as far as engaging with the general public. Most of the affected
communities, which are largely made up of subsistence farmers, also don't have
email addresses or access to the internet. The public's lack of awareness makes
plain that the World Bank's requirements haven't been met.
Nixon Boumba, an organizer from the Mouvman Demokratik
Popilè (MODEP) attended a consultation meeting in June. Invitations were sent
out by email, in French, and Boumba noted that the hotel hosting the event was
inaccessible by public transportation. The meeting was well attended by
representatives from mining companies, the Bureau of Mines and Energy, and the
Ministry of Economy and Finance. Boumba counted just seven civilians, himself
included. A 45-minute delay gave them little time to react to the 100-page
document written in what Boumba described as "legal jargon." "If
you're going to consult people, you have to consult them on something they can
understand," he said.
"This is an industry that even extremely well-developed
regulatory states like those in the US have had problems with," Meg
Satterthwaite, a lawyer and professor at New York University, "The idea
that a place that doesn't have a functioning regulatory state would be capable
at this stage of really regulating and monitoring such an inherently dangerous
industry seems facially questionable."
No comments:
Post a Comment