In 2012, Kansas’ Republican Gov. Sam Brownback signed a
landmark bill that delivered big tax cuts to high-income earners and
businesses. Less than two years after that tax cut, the state’s income tax
revenues plummeted by a quarter-billion dollars—and now Brownback is pushing to
use money for public employees’ pensions to instead cover the state’s ensuing
budget shortfalls.
Brownback’s proposal: Slash the state’s required pension
contribution by $40 million to balance the state budget, even though Kansas
already has one of the worst-funded pension systems in the nation. Brownback
defended his proposal to take money from state workers and use it to
effectively finance his tax cuts for the wealthy. He told the Wichita Eagle:
“It’s kind of, uh, well where are you going to go for the funds? And I don’t
like it, but it’s kind of what’s your other option if you don’t hit K-12 and
higher ed with allotments?”
Brownback is not alone.
New Jersey Republican Gov. Chris Christie in coupling large
tax breaks with cuts to actuarially required pension payments. Christie slashed
required pension payments while signing legislation expanding tax credits to
corporations, and doling out a record amount of taxpayer subsidies to
businesses. Many of those subsidies have flowed to firms whose executives have
made campaign contributions to Republican political organizations. Earlier this
month, New Jersey pension trustees filed a lawsuit against Christie for not
making legally required contributions to the state’s pension system.
Both Brownback and Christie promoted their tax cuts as
instruments to boost economic growth. Yet, a recent review of federal data by
the Kansas City Star found Kansas “trails most other states when it comes to
job growth.” Likewise, an investigative series by Gannett newspapers recently
found “New Jersey’s job growth rate is the second worst in the nation. ... New
Jersey’s middle class has lost billions in income through layoffs, salary cuts
and wage freezes and more than 100,000 job seekers have been unemployed for
months on end.”
In Illinois lawmakers did not make the full actuarially
required pension payments, causing severe funding shortages in the state’s pension
system. While lawmakers said there was little money to meet pension
obligations, Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn signed a corporate tax cut in 2011 that
is projected to cost the state more than $370 million a year in lost revenue.
Two years after signing that bill, as pension funding gaps swelled, Quinn
signed legislation slashing public employees’ retirement benefits. An Illinois
judge last month ruled that the legislation violated the state’s constitution,
though the ruling is being appealed.
The obvious question is: Where is the outrage? To date,
these attempts to use workers’ money to finance massive giveaways to the rich
have generated little media coverage or political opposition you might expect
to hear on talk radio, cable TV and in the halls of Congress. It appears that the
political and media class are perfectly
fine with wealth redistribution—as long as the cash flows from the 99 percent
to the 1 percent, and not the other way around.
It is the system that is rotten and the reason that it stays
rotten is that people every few years are changing the guards, blaming it on
the other party without changing capitalism. Nothing much changes for the
people.
No comments:
Post a Comment