Right-wing Republicans are aghast at Obama taking
presidential executive action to end a deportation threat to millions or nearly
half of the undocumented immigrant population currently living in the United
States.
But Arturo Carmona, executive director of Presente.org, the online
Latino advocacy organization, describes it as only "a partial
solution." Seven million immigrants, he said, "were left out of
today’s proposal all together, ensuring more deportations, separated families,
and the continuation of detention for nearly 34,000 immigrants, including children,
as a result of a profit-generating bed mandate for private prisons. On top of
all of that, border and immigrant communities are being terrorized on the
border every day, facing violence and outright murder. This militarization of
our border must end."
Ryan Campbell, communications director for the DREAM Action
Coalition, an advocacy and lobbying group also had reservations that Obama’s
legislation “left out millions who will face more enforcement from those
angered by Obama’s policy."
Cristina Jimenez, co-founder and managing director at United
We Dream said "But real talk?
Today’s victory is historic but it is incomplete."
The plan does not include a path to citizenship or access to
health insurance through the Affordable Care Act. While the deferral program
does apply to the parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents, it
does not include a way for the parents of Dreamers—people brought into the
country as children—to gain legal status. It directs more resources to border
security in what in what the ACLU described as "more boots on the throats
of border residents", with an emphasis on deporting new arrivals. According
to the Pew Research Center, deportations reached a historic high of nearly
440,000 in 2013, even though the president acknowledged Thursday illegal border
crossing are currently the lowest since the 1970s.
Although the AFL-CIO, pointed out that the plan still leaves
more than 6 million workers unprotected by explaining "… more than half of
those who currently lack legal protections will remain vulnerable to wage
theft, retaliation, and other forms of exploitation," but Richard Trumka, president of the labor
alliance unfortunately marred its case with the nationalististic American jobs
for American workers when he added in its statement “…we are concerned by the
President’s concession to corporate demands for even greater access to
temporary visas that will allow the continued suppression of wages in the tech
sector.”
In 2013, only 44,000 work visas for "skilled and unskilled"
labor were issued, according to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) data.
Over the last decade, the Republican-controlled state
capital in Arizona - with voter support as well as support from out-of-state
groups such as the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and
American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) - created dozens of anti-immigration
laws. At their heart was the principle of "attrition through
enforcement", the idea of creating laws to make Arizona so inhospitable
for undocumented immigrants that they would leave the state. Arizona made
headlines in 2010 when Republican Governor Jan Brewer enacted a bill sponsored
by Pearce, SB 1070, one of the toughest anti-immigrant laws in the country and
led to the "show me your papers" portion of SB 1070 that made it
mandatory for police to question someone about their legal status if the police
have "reasonable suspicion" that person is in the country illegally helped
deport two million people.
According to Ray Ybarra, a civil rights and criminal defence
attorney, explains "We are seeing a reversal, the state of Arizona finally
realises they've been spending too much money doing something that is outside
their realm and against the constitution." The manner in which these and
other laws were passed and enforced by local authorities in Latino
neighbourhoods created a toxic climate of fear for immigrants but appear to
have backfired.
In 2012, the US Supreme Court struck down three provisions
of SB 1070, including the one that made it a crime to be illegally present in
the state. In the past weeks, federal courts overturned two state laws that
Arizona authorities used to target undocumented immigrants. One made it a state
crime to knowingly transport unauthorised immigrants and another denied bail to
all undocumented immigrants accused of certain crimes so they would have to
stay in jail until their trial dates. A
third law that makes using a false identification for work a crime currently is
being challenged in federal court. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who rose
to national fame for his iron-fisted approach in dealing with undocumented
immigrants, had to limit his crackdown on immigration after a federal judge
ruled his officers violated civil rights of Latinos during his immigration
sweeps. Now his agency is under the close watch of a court imposed monitor who
supervises the way it conducts enforcement to ensure his officers don't
discriminate. Republican Senator Russell Pearce, the mastermind behind many of
the laws, role in the immigration crackdown partially led to his being voted
out of office in a special recall election in 2011, which had the support of
conservative Republicans concerned by the negative economic impact the laws had
on their communities.
No comments:
Post a Comment