The Joseph Rowntree Foundation have published a new report, Destitution in the UK 2023.
https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/destitution-uk-2023 (full report)
Socialism Or Your Money Back has many posts about JRF poverty reports.
Here’s one from 2009.
‘The
Guardian has
an
article on
new Joseph Rowntree Foundation report
on
UK poverty and the media and its findings that there isn't much
popular concern over UK poverty and places much of the blame on the
media, saying there is little appetite to address themes of poverty.
In newspapers, the subject is "worthy,
not newsworthy", and
journalists found it was often "difficult
to give poverty a focus, since it is ongoing and amorphous rather
than a specific 'event'".
In
other words , to paraphrase the Bible , the poor are always with us
Why
don't we have celebrities singing
"Let
them know it's Christmas time"
to
raise money for the 3 million or so children in this country living
below the poverty line? Why is there no Bono or Bob Geldof
marshalling the campaign to end child poverty? Why can't campaign
groups rouse sufficient outrage to get the public marching on the
streets.
"The
voices of people with experience of poverty...are severely
under-represented in media coverage,"
says
the report. On television, there is a danger of poverty turning into
a "spectator
sport"
that
entrenches an "us
and them" mentality,
the report also warns.
"There
is very little sympathetic portrayal of poor people. And people are
looking for reassuring images, that things are OK, things are fair
and that people at the bottom are there because it’s their fault
and therefore we’ve all earned on merit our position."
(Political
commentator)
As
a result of this information shortage, many doubt whether there
is"real"
poverty
in the UK and are unconvinced by the concept of relative poverty –
the measure by which the government measures deprivation here. The
public is either
"harshly judgmental" towards
people living in poverty or views poverty and inequality as
inevitable. The trend of judging individuals as creators of their own
poverty seems to be increasing. Journalists quite often used
stereotypical pictures and words to refer to people living in
poverty. Public awareness of the extent and reality of UK poverty is
limited. People often see it as the individual’s responsibility to
get out of poverty because they are not aware of the obstacles to
achieving this. However,those suffering from poverty and being in
receipt of benefits are stigmatised, so people are reluctant to speak
out.
While
the nature of poverty is very different from 50 years ago in the UK
and
from
absolute poverty in developing countries, not having what most people
take for granted is what many find difficult. Perhaps the starkest
examples are the cases of parents going without or falling into debt
so their children can have what others have, or their children being
bullied at school for not having the latest trend. This may not be
the poverty of material destitution. But if the measure of a human
being consists in the accumulation of material possessions to which
he or she may claim then , by that token, we are demeaned. And,
ultimately, it is in this devaluation of our human worth — not
simply in the fact of material inequality but in the meaning this
society attaches to it.
The
JRF calls for a debate that goes beyond building awareness of
poverty. This needs the presentation of narratives exploring the
causes of poverty and inequality. Over the decades the answer to the
cause of poverty has been staring all those NGOs and charities and
researchers in the face . It is capitalism .
Are
all reforms doomed to failure and do not really make a difference to
workers’ lives? Of course not - there are many examples of
‘successful’
reforms
in such fields as education, housing, child employment, conditions of
work and social security. But while there has been some ‘successful’
reforms,
none of them have ever done more than keep workers and their families
in efficient working order and, while reforms have sometimes taken
the edge off a problem, they have very rarely managed to remove that
problem completely. There have been some marginal improvements, but
the social problems that the reformers such as JRF have set out to
deal with have generally not been solved - hence the need for an
uncompromising socialist party to pursue revolutionary change.
Nobody
would deny today that poverty exists in the UK as many JRF reports
provide ample evidence of . But does it make sense to argue that
because we don't have socialism yet , we should, in
the meantime,
fight for reforms to at least reduce the worst effects of poverty.
This argument has been voiced by so many for so long that `in
the meantime' has
become forever. The time is long past and too many people have
suffered, are suffering, and will continue suffering until we attack
the cause itself.
There is one way, and one way only, to
abolish poverty, and that is to establish a socialist society in
which the tools of production will be commonly owned and administered
by the population as a whole in their own interests. In such a world,
not only poverty but all the social evils created by the profit
system will be abolished.’
https://socialismoryourmoneyback.blogspot.com/2009/09/reporting-poverty.htm
Fourteen years on, ‘The Guardian has an article on new Joseph Rowntree Foundation report on UK poverty...’The more things change the more they stay the same?
Main Stream Media all seemed to find it headline worthy that people are having to try and save the costs of electricity by turning off their fridges and freezers. Unsurprisingly, they are capitalist supporters after all, the solution to the ills of capitalism were not propounded.
From the 2023 Guardian report ‘a government spokesman said, ‘A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: “The cost of living payments have provided a significant financial boost to millions of households – just one part of the record £94bn support package we have provided to help with the rising cost of bills. This includes a 10.1% rise to benefits earlier this year, and we’re investing £3.5bn to help thousands into jobs – the best way to secure their financial security in the long term. Ultimately, the best way we can help families is to reduce inflation, and we’re sticking to our plan to halve it this year, taking the long-term decisions that will secure the country’s financial future.”
The conclusion of the 2009 blog post is even more relevant than ever: There is one way, and one way only, to abolish poverty, and that is to establish a socialist society in which the tools of production will be commonly owned and administered by the population as a whole in their own interests. In such a world, not only poverty but all the social evils created by the profit system will be abolished.’
l
1 comment:
Very true.
It is curious that there's an Extinction Rebellion, but no Poverty Rebellion. It's curious because workers believe governments can stop the capitalist enterprises they work for from heating-up the planet and destroying biodiversity, however, they accept governments can't end world poverty.
Post a Comment