Sunday, May 14, 2023

Britain supplies Ukraine with cruise missiles

 Russia Today, is, ‘a Russian state-controlled international news television network funded by the Russian government.’ Wiki. Its reporting of statements emanating from the various arms of the Russian Government should therefore be read as being one hundred per cent from the horses, or bears, mouth. 

On May 12th, under the headline, Russia warns Britain over cruise missiles, the following report appeared:

“London’s decision to supply Kiev with long-range cruise missiles is another step towards a “serious escalation” of the conflict in Ukraine, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Friday.

The ministry called the move “a very unfriendly step” on the UK’s part, which shows London’s “unprecedented level of involvement” in the conflict.

“Carried away with geopolitical games … the UK is apparently ready to cross any red lines and bring the conflict towards a totally new level when it comes to destruction and casualties,” the Foreign Ministry’s statement read.

Russia “reserves the right to take any measures deemed necessary to neutralise a threat that may arise from Ukraine’s use of the British cruise missiles,” the ministry said, adding that those behind this “reckless step” and London’s “destructive activities” in general would be to blame for the consequences.

On Thursday, the UK confirmed it was handing several of its Storm Shadow cruise missiles over to Ukraine. The weapons can hit targets over 250km (155 miles) away.’

(‘The Storm Shadows intended targets are command, control and communications centres; airfields; ports and power stations; ammunition management and storage facilities; surface ships and submarines in port; bridges and other high value strategic targets.’ Wiki.)

 ‘Defence Secretary Ben Wallace called it a “calibrated and proportionate response” by London to the situation in Ukraine

Washington indicated on Friday that it is reluctant to follow London’s example. The US has long refused to provide Kiev with longer-range weapons such as ATACMS missiles. In March, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley said it is not an option since the move would dwindle the Pentagon’s own stocks.

Western officials have reportedly said that giving Ukraine the option to attack targets inside Russian territory recognised by the US and its allies would be a major escalation of the conflict.

Kiev has long asked for longer-range weapons. President Vladimir Zelensky’s top adviser, Mikhail Podoliak, said this week that longer-range missiles could be used to strike Crimea, which Kiev considers an illegally occupied territory. The peninsula joined Russia in 2014 following a referendum.

Moscow has repeatedly warned Western nations that weapons deliveries to Ukraine make them de facto participants in the conflict – something many of them have vehemently denied.

On Thursday, the Kremlin vowed to have an “appropriate answer” to the deliveries of the British missiles.”

The US has provided Ukraine with around seventy five billion dollars worth of aid of one sort or another since the beginning of the conflict. (Kiel Institute for the World Economy).

The US has said however that it has no intention of supplying similar missiles to Ukraine.

No comments: