Plain and inescapable is the fact the reason for the
referendum on membership of the EU is, when we wish to discover the motive for
the really important activities of capitalist nations and their political
spokesmen, the motive is one of harsh, real, cold economic interest. Basically Big
Business needs a big market. The EU is an example of the continuous centralisation
of capital into bigger and bigger units. The dominant elements of the
capitalist class in Europe see an advantage in organising the economy of Europe
on a continent-wide basis because the EU is an attempt to overcome the limits
of developing the productive forces within Europe's nation-states. British
manufacturers fear that they will be undercut, not only in Europe, but in world
markets. It is a question of staying in Europe or being crushed by America and
China. The argument for and against the EU is basically between those companies
who think they will gain from remaining inside and those who think they will gain
from exit. Many say that the EU is a good idea but it is just another
super-power. Some nationalist delusions might disappear, but this would be no
advance if they were replaced by another, different one. Whether or not Britain
stays or goes is a capitalist not a working class issue. Neither solves, and is
not meant to solve, working class problems. It may not even solve British
capitalism's problem of markets. We are neither for staying in the EU, nor are
we against leaving. We regard this referendum as an irrelevant issue. Cameron’s
campaign to stay inside is to argue that to leave is too much of a gamble. Capitalism,
in fact, is one big gamble. Since its fortunes hang on the tail of its
unpredictable market, it can never be sure of what to do to secure its own interests.
Marx and Engels identified that 'the bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market given
a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country'
(Manifesto of the Communist Party.) Marx in Brussels in his January 1848 speech
On the Question of Free Trade said 'the
protective system of our day is conservative, while the free trade system is
destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the
proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade
system hastens the social revolution.' Earlier, Marx had attended a free
trade congress in Brussels in September 1847 for which he prepared a speech which
he never delivered. Engels wrote an account of the conference, summarising
Marx's view, and a fragment of the speech dealing with protectionism has
survived: 'If they (the protectionists)
speak consciously and openly to the working class, then they summarise their
philanthropy in the following words: It is better to be exploited by one's
fellow-countrymen than by foreigners.' (The Protectionists, the Free
Traders and the Working Class)
We are neither British nationalists nor European federalists
but world socialists. But we can see the special fallacy of the nationalist argument.
In the world as it is today, it is neither possible nor desirable for the
people of one part to stand apart from the rest. The pro-EU politicians, for
all their faults, at least realise that the people living on this island off
the north-west coast of the Eurasian land-mass need to be closely associated
with those on the mainland. Where they go wrong is in imagining that this can
be fruitful within the context of capitalism. There are small benefits for some
of the working class in Britain and those living abroad in the EU, other
sections of the working class in Britain may benefit from leaving EU, but the
majority of the working class will be unaffected by the dispute over the EU.
The dispute within the British capitalist class has no class interest for
workers. We advocate instead the establishment of a world community without
frontiers based on common ownership with production solely for use. We shall
register on our papers our commitment for world socialism. The question you are
being asked to answer—Stay or Leave—is of no concern to members of the working
class. Whatever the outcome of the vote, capitalism will continue. And continue
it will until you and a majority like you take the revolutionary step of
deciding to abolish capitalism in all its forms and to bring into being a new
society.
Socialism cannot operate in one country or in one continent.
It is a worldwide concept to deal with worldwide problems. Away with all the
trappings of capitalism—tariffs, customs duties, monetary union, competition,
buying, selling etc. Vote for nothing but common ownership. What is required is
association with not only the other peoples of Europe, but also beyond that
with those of the rest of the world, on the basis of socialism. What is
required is not a European Union but World Socialism where the Earth's
resources will be owned in common and democratically controlled through various
inter-linked administrative and decision-making bodies at world, regional and
local levels. We appreciate that this vision of a united one-world represents a
nightmare scenario for both Cameron and Boris Johnson but that's their problem
not ours.
No comments:
Post a Comment