The dehumanising language used by many European politicians
to debate the refugee crisis has echoes of the pre-second world war rhetoric
with which the world effectively turned its back on German and Austrian Jews
and helped pave the way for the Holocaust, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, the UN’s most
senior human rights official has warned.
He described Europe’s response to the crisis as amnesiac and
“bewildering and said the use of terms such as “swarms of refugees” were deeply
regrettable.
The high commissioner said the language surrounding the
issue reminded him of the 1938 Evian conference, when countries including the
US, the UK and Australia refused to take in substantial numbers of Jewish
refugees fleeing Hitler’s annexation of Austria on the grounds that they would
destabilise their societies and strain their economies. Their reluctance, Zeid
added, helped Hitler to conclude that extermination could be an alternative to
deportation. Three-quarters of a century later, he said, the same rhetoric was
being deployed by those seeking to make political capital out of the refugee
crisis. “It’s just a political issue that is being ramped up by those who can use
the excuse of even the smallest community as a threat to the sort of national
purity of the state,” he said. “If you just look back to the Evian conference
and read through the intergovernmental discussion, you will see that there were
things that were said that were very similar. Indeed, at the time, the
Australian delegate said that if Australia accepted large numbers of European
Jews they’d be importing Europe’s racial problem into Australia. I’m sure that
in later years, he regretted that he ever said this – knowing what happened
subsequently – but this is precisely the point. If we cannot forecast the
future, at least we have the past as a guide that should wisen us, alert us to
the dangers of using that rhetoric.”
Asked whether he believed that the UK home secretary,
Theresa May would also come to regret her choice of words, Zeid added: “Closer
examination of history and a closer examination of what happened in Europe in
the early part of the 20th century should make people think very carefully
about what it is that they’re saying. These are human beings: even in the use
of the word migrants, somehow it’s as if they don’t have rights. They all have
rights just as we have rights.” Zeid went on to say some European politicians
had descended into “xenophobia and in some cases outright racism”. He said:
“One wonders what has happened to Europe. Why is there so much amnesia? Why
don’t they properly distil from their experience that they’ve been down this
road before and it’s a very unhappy road if you continue to follow it.”
Zeid also accused some in the media of fomenting the idea
that migrants pose “a grave threat to the security of the country… when the
media begins to fan such opinions, I think we have to be very careful about
where this may lead and again we’ve had past experiences in Europe’s most
recent history which leave us very worried.” He felt compelled to criticise the
Sun newspaper after its columnist Katie Hopkins described migrants as
“cockroaches” because the word was “straight out of the language of [Nazi
publisher] Julius Streicher in the 1920s…”
No comments:
Post a Comment