We’re faced with feeding some 10 billion people by 2050 –
we’re challenged to produce more food, put more pressure on water, land, oceans
and entire ecosystems. If the current population and consumption trends
continue, humanity will need the equivalent of two earths to support us all by
2030. By 2050 we’ll be using three planets worth of natural resources to
maintain our ways of living. This mean it will take three years for the earth
to regenerate the resources we use in one year.
By 2050 humanity could be devouring 140 billion tonnes of
minerals, ores, fossil fuels and biomass per year – three times its current
rate – unless economic growth is decoupled from the rate of natural resources.
Our efforts to feed ourselves are a very clear example of
this dysfunctional relationship between production and consumption. The fact of
the matter is, the reason that some 800 million people go to bed hungry each
night, is not because we do not produce enough food. Hunger's root cause is not the scarcity of food but poverty,
itself linked to a spectrum of inequalities and revolving around questions of
access – access to water, land and other productive resources, access to
resources, income and markets as well as access to adequate social protection, FAODirector-General Jose Graziano da Silva said.
The UN Environment Program and UN Food and Agriculture
Organisation (FAO) had both pointed out that at least one third, or 1.3 billion
tonnes, of food produced is wasted each year. That corresponds to over 1.4
billion hectares of crop land. By way of comparison to provide perspective, Australia’s
total crop land was 32 million hectares.
http://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/feeding-10-billion-by-2050/2734262.aspx?storypage=0
Most areas of the United States could feed between 80 to 100
percent of the local population with food grown or raised within 50 miles, says
a study by the University of California, Merced. Researchers, who looked at
farms near every major population center in the U.S. from 1850 to 2000,
compared the potential calorie production to the city’s population to determine
the percentage of regional population that could be fed, Ibarra wrote. Researchers,
who said they expect data from 2000 to 2015 to yield similar results, said that
large agricultural areas such as Merced, Fresno, and Sacramento have the
farmland to feed 100 percent of their population, while a metro area like New
York City could feed 5 percent of the population within 50 miles and 30 percent
within 100 miles.
San Diego can support 35 percent of the people based on the
U.S. diet. This jumps to 51 percent of the population if people switched to
plant-based diets, the study showed.
No comments:
Post a Comment