Socialism, being the antithesis to global capitalism, will necessarily be the system of the world replacing the established system against which people are railing in greater numbers every year. Thanks to modern communication systems it is now easier than ever to reach even the most distant parts with our message of solidarity with the majority population. Together we can build world socialism. The article below gives a perspective from India, but insert different names and it could be the perspective from your country or mine.
It’s The Business, Stupid!
By Parvez Alam
Politics is all
about business and economics. Business conglomerates are running the
world and not the elected governments. The recent Oxfam report 2015 says
that “1% of the world’s population will own more wealth than the other
99% in 2016.” This is grave issue of inequality where democracy
prevails in more than 80% of the globe. Democracy stands for building
egalitarian society, that’s what common masses believed and accepted as
the political system. But it seems that ideals of democracy is muffled
and twisted for the ruling class. Mind it. Ruling classes are not at all
those who are at the helm of affairs in political affairs of the
country. It is them, those who are prevailing in economic affairs of the
country.
This is often repeated discourse
in India that are you son of Tata, Birla or Ambani? And if you are then
law is yours. The recent addition is Adani. Are you son of Adani? If
you are reading then, keep your head high because your father is growing
as no one has grown before in Indian history of capital accumulation.
According to the statistic Gautam Adani is new name in the list of 100
richest in India. According to the Forbes, Adani rose to eighth rank in
the list of Indian billionaires in 2015 from 609th rank in 2014. The
rocket-speed growth of one industrialist is telling story of political
economy of this country. Though it is sad story that, nothing much has
changed in one year rule (2014-2015) of Narendra Modi led government
except the change in nomenclature of the institutions and catchy titles.
Now coming back to the
conceptual linkages between political economy, corporate houses and
democracy, it is pertinent to establish the relational nexus between
these three. Today throughout in the world, capitalists are accumulating
wealth without any check and control. On the other hand people or
critical masses are denied basic rights which are promised in the
democracy. The political representatives everywhere in the world in one
way or other are funded by the capitalist forces during elections, which
is again one of the routine in five/six years. Political parties get
huge amount of money from different corporate/sources as part of their
fundraising. This leads to the political parties involving in doing
courtesy to the corporate houses by passing favorable laws contrary to
the ideals promised in the manifestos during election campaigns. This
has become norms and also the unwritten laws in capitalist democracies.
Reflecting upon the resistance
movements throughout the world against this loot and plunder of the
natural resources and wealth of the common masses, I believe we are
somehow convinced that one day our fate will change and our sons and
daughters will become like Ambanis, Adanis and Birlas. We are
disillusioned and at the same time optimistic about the future. Here
‘we’ represents I think, everyone who collectively forms the critical
mass. After all believing in change is also Marxian thought. What’s
wrong if we believe-in-change to become capitalist? Well, seriously the
movement against the plunder is not coherent and we are also lacking
global ideology to tackle the menace of imperial-capitalism.
So, thinking that any Modi or
Gandhi will change the destiny of this country is total farce. They can
do only business. Whether Aristotle will redefine his own idea of
politics or not but certainly ‘Man is social animal’ and for being
political animal, one needs to be businessman in 21st century.
‘Political’ today is thriving on the economic base of market and public
share is shrinking from the national sphere and going into the hands of
private enterprise. If we all know these linkages as well as leakages
and we are also talking about the plight of this country then what is
stopping us to question the governments or demanding for accountability
of the state structures.
The fundamental point is that we
are imparting our sons and daughters the kind of education which is
making them, robotic, mechanical and not critical. In other words, we
are imparting the kind of education which imperial-cum-capitalist forces
wants us to impart. Today large chunk of our education system is
controlled by these forces. They are in printing houses, they are
running chain of schools, they are running media houses, they are making
films, they are deciding cuisines and what not. This cumulatively
combines the epistemology or knowledge of everyday life. We are so much
into the trap of all these superfluous knowledge/s that we rarely get
time to reflect critically that what are the ulterior motives of these
hegemonic forces. The obvious answer of any laymen would be, control.
Yes, they want to control and
drive the world according to their wishes. We are driven by their
wishes. They wants us to fight among ourselves on petty issues of
religion, caste and sects, we oblige them. They want to deprive us from
our own basic rights, we accept it. They wants us to behave robotically,
we put extra efforts to prove that they are right. Our mental faculty
is shaped by their rosy promises about the future.
Today what is
necessary is very simple. Let’s question each and every authority, who
is trying to dictate its own terms. Let’s question what is till today
considered as unquestionable. Let’s question our body, our self, our
identity, our knowledge, our government, our world, our opinions, our
prejudices, our stereotyping of others. Let’s liberate ourselves through
questioning. I might sound pessimistic. But I am sure there are
hundreds and thousands of pessimists getting born everyday in opposition
of illusionary optimism which lacks meaning and sensibility. The
question I asked today is Was Marx right about accumulation of capital,
class distinction of bourgeoisie and proletariat? Was he right that
“history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class
struggles?” The class struggle of 1 per cent (haves) vs. 99 per cent
(have nots). How far Marxian ideals are going to be fulfilled by
withering away the state and uniting the workers of the world?
from here
No comments:
Post a Comment