As the death toll climbs it is once again apparent that even
a “natural” disaster such as an earthquake can be mitigated…with money.
‘If we had money we would have built a strong house,’ says one woman who, like hundreds of thousands of others across Nepal, has been left
homeless. “But we had none. There is no place to go. There is no one to look
after us. Life was hard for us already. I don’t want to be alive,” she said.
What all the casualties mostly share is that they are poor.
Though some had predicted that an earthquake in Kathmandu would bring the newly
constructed cement apartment blocks tumbling down, it was the older, brick and
wood homes that, almost exclusively, were reduced to rubble. Anyone who stayed
in these could not afford better.
“It’s obvious” said Bhaskar Gautam, a local sociologist “The
wealthier you are, the stronger the house you have,” .
Often four or five storeys high and subdivided into cheap
family apartments like tenements in Victorian London, the homes of people have
long been known as a risk. The family’s home was their “bad luck”. “We should have
moved 20 years ago,” said one victim.
Thousands are still camping on open spaces, frightened to
return to their homes. Some say they will wait until 72 hours have passed, but
continuing aftershocks scare. Many, too, are still seeking treatment for bad
injuries, some waiting outside hospitals. The morgue at Bir hospital, the
city’s biggest, is overflowing, with bodies now lined up outside.
There is also the fear of disease. “Now there could be
communicable illnesses, diarrhea, flu and so forth. The earthquake will have
broken all the sewers and pipes so the water supply will be contaminated,” said
Dr Sameer Thapa
It is necessary to understand why the poor suffer more even
in natural calamities. The world is structured in such a way the poor bear the
brunt. Poor people are and will be always most susceptible to disasters and
unpredictability (natural, financial, wars, etc.). They are unable to invest in
preventive, security, education and often lack surplus for relocation or
compensation. Poorer communities take far longer to rebuild and are far more to
likely to disease, aftershocks and becoming further impoverished because they
cannot to afford to privately re-build, move temporarily or simply migrate to another
area.
No comments:
Post a Comment