Wednesday, May 01, 2019

Que se vayan todos. Throw them all out.

"Mejor el diablo que conoces que el angelito desconocido (better the devil you know than the angel you don’t). At one time, the majority of people felt it was safer to stick with Maduro. They were not confident that the opposition would reflect their interest and the opposition's demands did not resonate with them. They kept their distance from the protests at that time. Now the prevailing attitude has become “Que venga cualquier persona, queno sea él [Maduro](Anyone who isn’t Maduro).

When it comes to Venezuela, the Socialist Party often adopts a plague on both houses, denying the need to take one side or the other in its polarised political situation. Venezuela’s crisis shows no signs of abating, and will likely get worse. Everything points to a scenario of more confrontation.

The Right opposition and its American sponsors has shown its willingness to sacrifice economic stability to achieve its goal of removing Maduro from office. Its future policies are intent upon once more reinforcing existing class and other inequalities of the pre-Chávez, elite-led Venezuela of old. At least some support for Guaidó comes from exhaustion, not enthusiasm. “No me causa emoción, ” (I’m not excited about him.) He has elicited support, most likely due to Maduro’s unpopularity. But no-one is convinced that Guaidó has the interests of the people at heart. Waning support of the poor and working-class for Maduro does not necessarily translate into acceptance of Guaidó. Many remain skeptical of the opposition, with good reason.

Protests in past years against the government have tended to be centered in wealthier neighborhoods, in January of this year, protests against Maduro began to break out across a number of poor and working-class neighborhoods, in places like Catia, La Vega, El Valle, and Petare.

The first mainstream media, portrays the government as a dictatorial regime engaged in ruthless repression of a heroic opposition peacefully seeking a return to democratic rule. The Venezuelan government portrays a democratically elected government besieged by a violent, unhinged opposition that represents the wealthy elite and is the tool of the US empire which will stop at nothing to achieve regime change, regardless of the legality.

The proposition that Venezuela is authoritarian has been repeated ad nauseam and purposefully ignores the repeated times the country has gone to the polls under Chavez and Maduro. Charges of electoral fraud are baseless. While earlier claims of Venezuela’s authoritarianism had little merit, Venezuela has been moving in an authoritarian direction. There are many criticisms of the Maduro government’s shortcomings and errors and they should not be off-limits nor should their seriousness be played down, simply because Maduro is the target of Washington's regime-change.There is also ample evidence the opposition’s willingness to use violent and unconstitutional means against the government

It is not clear when Venezuela’s downward spiral will end. Socialists cannot turn a blind eye to the slide into authoritarianism, not because of a belief in representative democracy, but that authoritarian rule is incompatible with building a socialist movement. A general sentiment that has been growing is that neither side can be trusted. Yoana, a teacher, echoed that disillusionment. “There is no one to believe in now... we want a change, but we don't know with whom.” Many Venezuelans see little difference between Maduro and Guaidó. While one is fighting to maintain his position of power, the other is fighting to gain it. While there was very much to critique about Chavez, for a number of years he accomplished something of a miracle by giving the poor a central place in the public and political discourse. The constitutionality or legality of either Guiadó’s or Maduro’s claims will matter little if people view politics as an elite arena where politicians fight for a small group of cronies.

The Socialist Party stands in solidarity with the majority of Venezuelans who are suffering under an incompetent, unaccountable government, opposed by a vengeful, violent right-wing opposition. If anyone is paying the price of this proxy-war, it is the people with their access to health services, food, and transportation restricted and limited

Adapted from here

No comments: