On
Friday the 24th of May, it is estimated that that at least
1,351 separate school strikes are now scheduled to take place across
the world in 110 countries.
"What
we decide to do collectively as a species politically, globally, over
the next decade is going to determine the future of the next
generations in terms of the habitability of the planet."
explained the author of the latest research that presents a scenario
of sea-level rises of double the previous estimates.
Capitalism
is the social system under which we live and is primarily an economic
system of competitive capital accumulation out of the surplus value
produced by wage labour. As a system it must continually accumulate
or go into crisis. Consequently, human needs and the needs of our
natural environment take second place to this imperative. The
docility of the world population has contributed greatly to keeping
intact the increasingly unequal, barbaric and rapacious society that
is global capitalism. Because people believe there is no alternative
to capitalism, it keeps on existing. The idea of a zero-growth,
sustainable society is not new and in recent years has been put
forward by many in the environmentalist movement. But while appearing
to be desirable, the fatal flaw is they also stand for the
continuation of the market system which is the cause of the problems
in the first place.
Capitalist
investors want to end up with more money than they started out with,
but why? Capitalism is an ever-expanding economy of capital
accumulation. In other words, most of the profits are capitalised,
i.e. reinvested in production, so that production, the stock of means
of production, and the amount of capital, all tend to increase over
time. The economic circuit is thus money - commodities - more money -
more commodities - even more money.
This
is not the conscious choice of the owners of the means of production.
It is something that is imposed on them as a condition for not losing
their original investment. Competition with other capitalists forces
them to re-invest as much of their profits as they can afford to in
keeping their means and methods of production up to date. As a result
there is continuous technological innovation. Defenders of capitalism
see this as one of its merits and in the past it was insofar as this
has led to the creation of the basis for a non-capitalist society in
which the technologically-developed means of production can be
now, and could have been any time in the last 100 years, consciously
used to satisfy people’s wants and needs. Under capitalism this
whole process of capital accumulation and technical innovation is a
disorganised, impersonal process which causes all sorts of
problems—particularly on a worldscale where it is leading to the
destruction of the environment.
The result is waste, pollution, environmental degradation on a global scale. The ecologist’s dream of a sustainable ‘zero growth’ within capitalism will always remain just that, a dream. If human society is to be able to organise its production in an ecologically acceptable way, then it must abolish the capitalist economic mechanism of capital accumulation and gear production instead to the direct satisfaction of needs.
The result is waste, pollution, environmental degradation on a global scale. The ecologist’s dream of a sustainable ‘zero growth’ within capitalism will always remain just that, a dream. If human society is to be able to organise its production in an ecologically acceptable way, then it must abolish the capitalist economic mechanism of capital accumulation and gear production instead to the direct satisfaction of needs.
While
a number of radicals within the green movement claim to advocate a
society based on cooperation and production-for-use, a sustainable
society where production is in harmony with the environment and
affairs are run in a decentralised and democratic manner, promoting
that only in such a system can ecological problems be solved, a
deeper reading makes it is perfectly clear that this sustainable
society doesn't challenge the continuance of the exchange economy nor
the existence of private ownership. They are firmly wedded to a form
of capitalism, albeit based on local smaller-scale enterprises, with
a greatly-reduced dependence on the world market but
still holding a belief that capitalism can be reformed so as to be
compatible with achieving an environmentally sustainable society.
Those green radicals have never been able to reconcile how they can
achieve a zero growth, sustainable society whilst retaining a market
system which includes an irresistible, built-in pressure to increase
sales for profit and where if sales collapse, society tends to break
down in recession, unemployment and financial crisis. Capitalism
differs from previous class societies in that under it production is
not for direct use, not even of the ruling class, but for sale on a
market. Competitive pressures to minimise costs and maximise sales,
profit-seeking and blind economic growth, with all their destructive
effects on the rest of nature, are built-in to capitalism. These make
capitalism inherently environmentally unfriendly. The ecological
contradictions of capitalism make any sustainable "green"
capitalism, a confidence trick.
The
Socialist Party place ourselves unambiguously in the camp of those
who argue that capitalism and a sustainable relationship with the
rest of nature are not compatible. The excessive consumption of both
renewal and non-renewable resources and the release of waste that
nature can’t absorb that currently goes on are not just accidental
but an inevitable result of capitalism’s very essence. The
capitalist system creates vast amounts of energy waste in the
military and its socially useless jobs such as marketing, finance and
banking which are part of its profit making machine. Endless growth
and the growing consumption of nature-given materials this involves
is built into capitalism. If the environmental crisis is to be
solved, this system must go. What is required is political action -
political action aimed at replacing this system by a new and
different one. There can be no justification, on any grounds
whatsoever, for wanting to retain an exploitative system which robs
workers of the products of their labour, which puts privileged class
interests and profit before the needs of the community, which robs
the soil of its fertility, plunders nature of its resources and
destroys the natural systems on which all our lives depend.
No comments:
Post a Comment