Sunday, June 02, 2019

America is no protector of Nature

Not so long ago the blog highlighted the weakening Australia's commitment to conservation areas for commercial reasons. The United States is going down the same road.

A report, authored by 21 international scientists, published in the journal Science, found that the pace of proposed rollbacks in the US has accelerated, with 90% having taken place since 2000. Nearly all of those proposals (99%) were associated with industrial-scale development projects, including infrastructure construction and oil and gas extraction. The report specifically calls out Donald Trump’s downsizing of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments, the largest protected area reductions in US history, as highlighting “the increasingly uncertain future of US PAs [protected areas]”.

The recent legal changes that have scaled back protections in the US are just unprecedented,” said Mike Mascia, a senior vice-president at Conservation International and the report’s senior author. “And they send a dangerous message to the rest of the world.”

The report placed the US within an international picture, tracking attempts to diminish protected areas in 73 countries between 1892 and 2018, and found that the majority (78%) were enacted since 2000. Many of those policy changes were proposed to make way for industry, such as the construction of hydro-powered dams in Amazonian countries including Brazil.
Around the world, protected areas appear to be facing increasing threats from industrial-scale developers, said Lisa Naughton-Treves, a geographer at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
When I started, the threats were largely from the uncontrolled expansion of agriculture or hunting,” explained Naughton-Treves, who has worked on protected areas for nearly 30 years. “Now it’s more about dams, mining, natural gas exploration – these high-investment, industrial threats.”

Mark Lubell, an environmental scientist at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in the research, said, that opening up wilderness areas to industry can cause long-term ecological damage and risk their ability to be protected in the future. “When you open up roadless, wilderness areas to oil and gas extraction,” he said, “those areas can lose the qualities that made them eligible for wilderness designations and protections in the first place.”

No comments: