Almost £6 billion of UK arms have been licensed to Saudi Arabia
since David Cameron took office.
“UK weapons have been central to a bombing campaign that has
killed thousands of people, destroyed vital infrastructure and inflamed
tensions in the region. The UK has been complicit in the destruction by
continuing to support airstrikes and provide arms, despite strong and
increasing evidence that war crimes are being committed.”
The Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT) warns that the
government’s refusal to suspend current licences to Saudi Arabia, and its
decision “to continue the granting of new licences” for military equipment that
may be destined for use in Yemen, is unlawful, contravening article two of the
EU Council Common Position on arms sales, which would compel the UK to deny an
export licence if there was “a clear risk” that equipment might be used in a
violation of international humanitarian law.
CAAT have given the government 14 days to suspend licences
allowing the export of military equipment to Saudi Arabia, pending the outcome
of a review of its obligations under EU law and its own licensing criteria. A
failure to comply would see proceedings against the government, which would
force it to explain in the high court what steps it has taken to ensure that UK
military hardware is not being used in breach of international law.
A Foreign Office minister, Tobias Ellwood, told parliament
last July: “We have not seen any credible evidence that suggests that the
[Saudi-led] coalition has breached the law.”
However, Amnesty International has warned of “a pattern of
appalling disregard for civilian lives displayed by the Saudi Arabia-led
military coalition”. The UN has expressed similar concerns. Last year Saudi-led
coalition strikes hit a Médecins Sans Frontières mobile clinic and hospital and
several schools. More than 7,500 people have been killed and over 14,000 others
injured since Saudi airstrikes began in Yemen. The Saudi war has also taken a
heavy toll on the impoverished country’s facilities and infrastructure. Saudi
coalition strikes are alleged to have targeted electricity and water plants.
Meanwhile, Britain’s College of Policing has trained 270 police
officers from Saudi Arabia despite the state’s poor human rights record, which
includes torture and the death penalty. Human rights groups are demanding the
college, which is a sub-body of the Home Office, disclose the kind of training
it has given the Gulf state. But the educational body is refusing to release
this information.
Maya Foa of human rights group Reprieve also argued the
college should be more transparent, particularly in a climate of heightened
concern over torture in Saudi Arabia. “The Home Office has serious questions to
answer over the relationship between British police and Saudi forces, who are
responsible for serious human rights abuses such as torture," she said. "Given
that the Saudis are executing record numbers of people – including political
protesters who were tortured and convicted in secret courts, some when they
were just teenagers – the government’s refusal to reveal details of its
cooperation with the Saudis is totally unacceptable. The Home Secretary must
explain urgently why she is risking UK complicity with these terrible abuses.”
2 comments:
The Canadian government has “no intention” of cancelling a controversial $15 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia despite decrying the oil-rich kingdom’s execution of 47 prisoners:
http://ind.pn/1VFOcOU
Yep...just as the blog earlier reported
http://socialismoryourmoneyback.blogspot.com/2016/01/sales-are-louder-than-words.html
Post a Comment