How Economic Growth Has Become Anti-Life
By Vandana Shiva
01 November, 2013
An obsession with growth has eclipsed
our concern for sustainability, justice and human dignity. But people
are not disposable – the value of life lies outside economic development
Limitless growth is the fantasy of economists, businesses and
politicians. It is seen as a measure of progress. As a result, gross
domestic product (GDP), which is supposed to measure the wealth of
nations, has emerged as both the most powerful number and dominant
concept in our times. However, economic growth hides the poverty it
creates through the destruction of nature, which in turn leads to
communities lacking the capacity to provide for themselves.
The concept of growth was put forward as a
measure to mobilise resources during the second world war. GDP is based
on creating an artificial and fictitious boundary, assuming that if you
produce what you consume, you do not produce. In effect , “growth”
measures the conversion of nature into cash, and commons into
commodities.
Thus nature’s amazing cycles of renewal
of water and nutrients are defined into nonproduction. The peasants of
the world,who provide 72% of the food, do not produce; women who farm or
do most of the housework do not fit this paradigm of growth either. A
living forest does not contribute to growth, but when trees are cut down
and sold as timber, we have growth. Healthy societies and communities
do not contribute to growth, but disease creates growth through, for
example, the sale of patented medicine.
Water available as a commons shared
freely and protected by all provides for all. However, it does not
create growth. But when Coca-Cola sets up a plant, mines the water and
fills plastic bottles with it, the economy grows. But this growth is
based on creating poverty – both for nature and local communities. Water
extracted beyond nature’s capacity to renew and recharge creates a
water famine. Women are forced to walk longer distances looking for
drinking water. In the village of Plachimada in Kerala, when the walk
for water became 10 kms, local tribal woman Mayilamma said enough is
enough. We cannot walk further; the Coca-Cola plant must shut down. The
movement that the women started eventually led to the closure of the
plant.
In the same vein, evolution has gifted us
the seed. Farmers have selected, bred, and diversified it – it is the
basis of food production. A seed that renews itself and multiplies
produces seeds for the next season, as well as food. However,
farmer-bred and farmer-saved seeds are not seen as contributing to
growth. It creates and renews life, but it doesn't lead to profits.
Growth begins when seeds are modified, patented and genetically locked,
leading to farmers being forced to buy more every season.
Nature is impoverished, biodiversity is
eroded and a free, open resource is transformed into a patented
commodity. Buying seeds every year is a recipe for debt for India’s poor
peasants. And ever since seed monopolies have been established, farmers
debt has increased. More than 270,000 farmers caught in a debt trap in
India have committed suicide since 1995.
Poverty is also further spread when
public systems are privatised. The privatisation of water, electricity,
health, and education does generate growth through profits. But it also
generates poverty by forcing people to spend large amounts of money on
what was available at affordable costs as a common good. When every
aspect of life is commercialised and commoditised, living becomes more
costly, and people become poorer.
Both ecology and economics have emerged
from the same roots – "oikos", the Greek word for household. As long as
economics was focused on the household, it recognised and respected its
basis in natural resources and the limits of ecological renewal. It was
focused on providing for basic human needs within these limits.
Economics as based on the household was also women-centered. Today,
economics is separated from and opposed to both ecological processes and
basic needs. While the destruction of nature has been justified on
grounds of creating growth, poverty and dispossession has increased.
While being non-sustainable, it is also economically unjust.
The dominant model of economic
development has in fact become anti-life. When economies are measured
only in terms of money flow, the rich get richer and the poor get
poorer. And the rich might be rich in monetary terms – but they too are
poor in the wider context of what being human means.
Meanwhile, the demands of the current
model of the economy are leading to resource wars, oil wars, water wars,
food wars. There are three levels of violence involved in
non-sustainable development. The first is the violence against the
earth, which is expressed as the ecological crisis. The second is the
violence against people, which is expressed as poverty, destitution and
displacement. The third is the violence of war and conflict, as the
powerful reach for the resources that lie in other communities and
countries for their limitless appetites.
Increase of moneyflow through GDP has
become disassociated from real value, but those who accumulate financial
resources can then stake claim on the real resources of people – their
land and water, their forests and seeds. This thirst leads to them
predating on the last drop of water and last inch of land on the planet.
This is not an end to poverty. It is an end to human rights and
justice.
Nobel-prize winning economists Joseph
Stiglitz and Amartya Sen have admitted that GDP does not capture the
human condition and urged the creation of different tools to gauge the
wellbeing of nations. This is why countries like Bhutan have adopted the
gross national happiness in place of gross domestic product to
calculate progress. We need to create measures beyond GDP, and economies
beyond the global supermarket, to rejuvenate real wealth. We need to
remember that the real currency of life is life itself.
Dr. Vandana Shiva is a
philosopher, environmental activist and eco feminist. She is the
founder/director of Navdanya Research Foundation for Science,
Technology, and Ecology.
mirrored from here
No comments:
Post a Comment