In front of British courts last year were 148,000 people who had 15 or
more previous convictions, according to government figures. These
reports deserve closer scrutiny.
The justice minister, Chris Grayling, has used these figures to
suggest a need to rush through plans to privatise most of the probation
service in order to reduce re-offending rates. “The public are fed up
with crooks doing their time and going straight back to crime, and so is
the government,” Grayling said.
Yet all the signs are that Britain’s probation services are doing their jobs pretty well - and there is a large and long-standing body of evidence that prison itself makes criminals more likely to re-offend.
In 1990, a Conservative white paper concluded: “We know that prison
‘is an expensive way of making bad people worse’.” That report also
argued that there should be a range of community-based sentences, which
would be cheaper and more effective alternatives to prison.
But just as this report was being published, Douglas Hurd was
replaced as home secretary by the more hardline Michael Howard - whose
first major move was to throw the white paper away, and to announce to
rapturous applause at the Conservative Party conference that “prison
works”.
Howard was not an outlier; as crime and punishment has become a key
political and social issue over the past 30 years, the old consensus –
that prison should be used as a last resort and only for the most
serious offences – has disappeared in favour of a harsher approach. Most
tellingly, one of the key features of the New Labour political project
was a determination never to be outflanked by the Conservatives on law
and order.
Blair’s mantra of “tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime”
summed up this shift in thinking, and a series of Labour home
secretaries ushered in a range of measures such as Anti-Social Behaviour
Orders (ASBOs) and changes to sentencing. The result has been a huge
increase in the prison population at a time when crime rates have
generally been in decline: while ONS figures
show that crime rates are at their lowest since 2002-3, statistics from
the International Centre for Prison Studies demonstrate the mounting
number of inmates:
The UK’s prison population has thus increased by an average rate of 3.6% per year since 1993. As the situation currently stands,
England and Wales’s incarceration rate is 148 people per 100,000 -
compared to 98 in France, 82 in the Netherlands and 79 in Germany.
The Ministry of Justice statistic bulletin
for Probation Trusts for the year to March 2013 shows a re-offending
rate of 9.18%, based on a cohort size of 616,252. This is the lowest
figure since 2008; the rate of re-offending in 2008-13 has remained
fairly constant at around 9.8%.
Even then, the data is not so simple. Recidivism varies sharply with
prisoner age and the length of prison terms: while 47% of adults are
re-convicted within a year, this applies to 58% of those on shorter
sentences, while for those under 18 the figure is an astonishing 78%.
The National Audit Office study Managing Offenders on Short Custodial Sentences
calculated in 2010 that the re-offending by ex-offenders in 2007-08
cost the economy between £9.5 and £13 billion – the vast majority due to
offenders who have served short sentences. Meanwhile, the Ministry of
Justice’s 2013 re-offending statistics show that those on community sentences offended significantly less than those given custodial terms.
As the Ministry of Justice calculates that the average prison place costs £37,648 per year, around 12 times the price
of the average probation or community service order, it is strange to
see the apparently effective probation service blamed for problems which
many would attribute to prisons themselves.
by Ian Cummins, Senior Lecturer in Social Work at Salford University
more here
Whilst 'Blair’s mantra of “tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime”' is not discussed in the article SOYMB would attribute most of the causes of crime to the divisive, inequitable system of capitalism which purports to represent the interests of all sections of the people. In its place we advocate a system, organised democratically by the people - not by self-interested leaders, of social cohesion attained through the process of direct involvement in decision making at all levels with the aim of creating societies that function for the benefit of all and not for profit.
JS
No comments:
Post a Comment