How do you decide who to marry, or whether to marry at all? How many
children to have? Whether to engage in short-term hookups or long-term
partnerships?
We don't like to think that economic forces outside our individual
control can shape the most intimate aspects of our lives. But a growing
body of evidence suggests that inequality is changing not only American
family structures, but the roles men and women play and the calculations
they make in pairing and establishing households. Inequality changes
who we are, individually and collectively.
For example, there are fewer men with stable economic cicrumstances
for women to choose from as appropriate long-term partners at both the
lower and middle rungs of the economic ladder. A shortage of men in the
less financially stable groups means that the guys who do look like good
prospects don't feel any particular pressure to commit. So they don't.
On the other hand, working-class and poor women who consider marrying
men who may get laid off or become financial burdens are less ready to
commit themselves.
At the top of the economic ladder, conditions are quite different.
There people have resources to cope with childcare, good schools,
therapy, and other things that can help families succeed. More lasting
commitments and greater family stability go hand-in-hand with greater
resources.
Law professors June Carbone and Naomi Cahn have been investigating how inequality influences family life. In their new book, Marriage Markets: How Inequality is Remaking the American Family,
they find we are creating profound social changes through America's
tolerance of wealth and income disparities. In the New Gilded Age, class
once again becomes a dominant force in human life, just as it was
aboard the Titanic.
To read the email interview with the authors click here
No comments:
Post a Comment