Socialism
is not a religion but a method of understanding and changing the
world. We are sure that there will be many adaptations to suit
particular conditions and specific situations, taking into account
the history, the geography and local traditions and customs.
According to Professor David Reay, a climate scientist from the
University of Edinburgh, we’re
always told “buying local” is best for the environment yet
food miles are a poor indicator of a product’s total carbon
footprint, and could even be misleading. The green message “buy local” needs to go with “in season”.
“I
went in thinking really distant food stuff like bananas coming from
the Dominican Republic or tea from Assam in India would have really
high carbon footprints because of the food miles,” said Professor
Reay. “Actually when you look at the life cycle, food miles are not
a major part. It was how they were produced and how people used them
when they got to the UK that matters. So that was a real eye-opener.”
Professor
Reay said: “If you just assume everything closer to you is better,
so if you’re thinking these blueberries or cucumber from Holland in
January will be low carbon, they won’t be. It’s going to be
intensive production with a high carbon footprint. This
will massively outweigh the food miles of bringing them from a
country where the climate is right at that time of year.
Buying
a tomato grown in the UK has three times the footprint of a banana
grown in Spain. Bananas imported from the Dominican Republic, apples
from New Zealand and oranges from Brazil are among the most
carbon-friendly foods UK consumers can buy. Most oranges
consumed in the UK come from Brazil and are shipped across the
Atlantic, but still have low carbon footprints. This is because 60
per cent of an orange’s life-cycle footprint has been embedded in
their flesh before it has left the farm gate, according to
Professor Reay’s new book, Carbon-Smart
Food.
Most
of this comes from fertilisers, pesticides and the fuel
used by machinery during harvesting. They are then processed and
sorted. If the orange is used to make juice, 22 per cent of the total
footprint is down to transport and distribution. Lettuces
grown in the UK during winter are cultivated in poly tunnels which
require lots of energy to keep them warm. In terms of carbon
emissions, it is more environmentally friendly to buy them from Spain
during the winter and in the UK during the summer. Professor Reay
says consumers should avoid eating out-of-season soft fruit such as
raspberries and blueberries.
“If
you want to go into the high carbon footprint foods then once it’s
been air freighted you’re in real trouble. That’s when the food
miles absolutely soar in terms of emissions. We should have a blanket
ban on air freight,” said Professor Reay.
Many
environmentalists activists lead the call decentralisation and
localism. While it is important to pay attention to question of
large-scale concentration of industry, doing so does not solve all of
our problems. A vision for a socialist society which functions in a
complementary way and in harmony with nature is our goal.There is no
squaring the circle of the capitalist system and a viable sustainable
planet. There is no way for capitalism, resource use for profit. Some
environmentalists activists lead the call decentralisation and
localism. While it is important to pay attention to the question of
large-scale concentration of industry, doing so does not solve all of
our problems. Certain industries require centralisation for
efficiency, and economy of scale actually may reduce environmental
impact in many of these cases.
Socialism
remains on the agenda for as long as capitalism exists. There are no
inevitabilities in socialism and no guarantees of victory either;
only alternatives for people to choose to aspire to achieve.
Capitalism remains, but this, by itself, cannot be seen as an
argument for the desirability, or a sign of the progressiveness of
the capitalist order, much less as any sort of 'triumph' of
capitalism. The system is in the grip of crises which they cannot
resolve. Our purpose is not to manage capitalism in order to make it
nicer or more ethical. Our goal is to move beyond the capitalism
system of economics. The principal task of socialists is to try to
restore the credibility of socialism in the consciousness of millions
of men and women. We can formulate these in near biblical terms:
eliminate hunger, clothe the naked, give a dignified life to
everyone, save the lives of those who die for lack of proper medical
attention, the elimination of illiteracy, generalise free access and
universalise democratic freedoms, human rights, and eliminate
repressive violence in all its forms.
None of this is dogmatic or
utopian. Although people are not ready to fight for socialist
revolution, it can raise pertinent questions. What type of food
production is possible? With what agrarian techniques? In which
places? Which materials can be produced? In which localities on the
largest scale?
The
struggle for socialism is not the dogmatic and sectarian imposition
of some pre-established objective on the real movement. The building
of socialism is a huge laboratory of new experiences which are still
undefined. We must learn from practice. We must take into account the
fact that the stakes in the world today are dramatic: it is literally
a question of the physical survival of humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment