Air,
water, food; the three essential requirements of life. Humans can
survive for barely 2-3 minutes without air, several days without
water and at most a few weeks without food. Food is a
multi-trillion-a-year economy, selling a necessity of life, which
impoverishes more people than any other sector where some of us are
reduced to a daily recurring position of no money, nothing to eat.
Remember the Irish 'potato' famine when thousands upon thousands died
of starvation as a result of potato blight decimating the crops of
the indigenous population? Food was not scarce, there was plenty of
production of food for export and for the wealthy but beyond the
means of the local poor. The difference today is the geographical
location and the sheer scale of the problem. Thus the cycle
continues. More impoverishment. More hunger.
The
Socialist Party has always contended that the world could produce
enough to feed every human being on the planet. This has been
confirmed time and again by bodies such as the UN’s Food and
Agriculture Organisation and World Health Organisation as well as by
other specialists in the field. Capitalism denies or overrides local
needs and wishes and is responsible for the devastation of farmers
and farming communities worldwide, evidence the year on year increase
in suicide by farmers in both developed and developing countries. In
the present system many, many people living in cities are employed in
work that is irrelevant to socialism, non-productive jobs entailing
transactions with money. In socialism these will be people freed up,
a huge labour resource free to live and work in a location of their
choice unrestricted by commercial constraints.
One
of the first tasks of socialism will be to rectify the worst effects
of capitalism on populations, to ensure that local needs are
satisfied in all locations. On the agricultural issue this may, at
least initially, curtail the growing of (now-called) "cash"
crops such as tea, coffee, tobacco or bananas whilst local
populations stabilise their ability to feed all their own
inhabitants. Emphasis would be placed on the quality, health and
fertility of the soil, sustainability being paramount. Farmers in the
developed world would be freed from the constraints of capital,
quotas, restrictions and above all competition, enabling them to
produce foods required by the local populace and, if need be, in
other parts of the world.
The
technology and infrastructure for moving food around is currently
well established globally, although in capitalist hands. Where it is
not well established then it will be a priority to increase or
establish it. Processing plants, packing houses, transport vehicles
from local to international, cold storage, warehousing facilities,
stock keeping know-how, all the necessary components are already on
hand with individuals well-versed in logistics adjusting supply to
demand and ensuring sufficient supplies for each and every area, the
main difference from now will be satisfying need not profit.
Consider
the production of food in a society without the need for profit,
without the competition from big businesses, without promotional
advertising, without any money changing hands. People deciding what
they want to eat and feed to their children rather than be dictated
to by big name manufacturers pushing their profitable lines. No one
would go without. There would be absolutely no reason to. More would
see it as a necessary route to a healthy life. Cooking and eating as
a social activity to be shared and enjoyed. You are what you eat
after all. It's food for thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment