“In
every revolution of the past the false and cowardly plea that the
people were “not yet ready” has prevailed. Some intermediate
class invariably supplanted the class that was overthrown and “the
people” remained at the bottom where they have been since the
beginning of history. They have never been “ready” to rid
themselves of their despots, robbers and parasites. All they have
ever been ready for has been to exchange one brood of vampires for
another to drain their veins and fatten in their misery.” -
Eugene Debs
It
is a commonplace that every new truth is at first ridiculed and then
argued against before it is accepted by the majority of mankind. As
long as people are plagued by vital needs and driven by aspirations
to a better life, those hopes are doomed to remain out of reach
unless they can win over the people.
The
idea and demand for workers’ participation, workers’ control,
self-management, direct workers’ rule, workers’ democracy are
deeply rooted in one way or another, permeate the world socialist
movement. While it was once felt that the working class can effect
its management rights through “its” state, party or trade union,
now considerable attention is being devoted to building up various
alternatives of participation. Reformist parties are increasingly
adopting a critical stand towards nationalisation, suggesting
self-managed cooperatives as their concept of “socialism”. It was
once customary for the wage-workers to be told that they must look to
the government for salvation and we were assured that the hope of the
workers lay in State ownership and control even though it left them
at the mercy of unsympathetic and irresponsible ministers. In the
Communist
Manifesto Marx and Engels wrote
of
“centralising all means of production in the hands of the state.”
They never again repeated this proposal, explaining
that it was obsolete.
Their
view of the state had changed and developed.
A
trade union is to defend the day-to-day interests of the workers and
to improve their conditions as much as possible before they can be in
any position to make the revolution and by it change today’s
wage-earners into free workers, freely associating for the benefit of
all. For a trade union to serve its own ends and at the same time act
as a means of education and ground for propaganda it requires to
gather together all workers – or at least those workers who look to
an improvement of their conditions – and to be able to put up some
resistance to the bosses. Can a union possibly wait for all the
workers to become socialist before inviting them to organise
themselves and before recruiting them? Trade unionism is
by nature reformist. Ameliorations of conditions, no matter their
number, never lead to a transformation of the system. No-one has the
right, for the sake of one or two palliatives to make a worker forget
his or her subjugation.
The
Socialist Party seeks to deprive the capitalist class of its
anti-social power. Our last word will always and everywhere be: “The
emancipation of the working class!" A socialist society must be
one in which there is democratic control of all institutions, which
have a major effect on men's lives and where there is equal
opportunity for creative non-exploitative self-development. It is now
time to go beyond the welfare state. The radical reformers of
yesterday, to-day sell their mercenary souls in exchange for the
assurance of re-election. We oppose reformist policy on the grounds
that reforms do not solve the working-class problem of poverty, even
though reforms might have some immediate benefit. It is true that the
workers' standard of living is itself not unalterably fixed. It is
possible, in certain favourable circumstances, for the workers to win
for themselves, through organised struggle, a higher standard of
living.
On the other hand it is possible for the standard to be
beaten down to lower levels. It must, however,
be observed that any such raising or lowering represents a certain
change in the relative strengths of the capitalists and workers, and
is, therefore, not to be confused with the Labour Party notion of the
expenditure of Government money on social reforms, represent a
corresponding gain to the workers. Unless the bargaining position of
the workers has been improved for other reasons, these surface
changes are followed by wage reductions which leave the workers where
they were. The
capitalists do not live by engaging in wealth production themselves,
but by living on the backs of the wealth producers. And they do this
not by dishonest merchanting and shopkeeping, but by appropriating
the proceeds of the workers' labour at the point of production. It is
out of the surplus extracted from workers' toil that the whole
capitalist class lives—industrialists, landlords, and bankers. It
is out of this that they have to provide the cost of the Government,
which protects their property and their economic system. What the
workers get out of capitalism— the amount and quantity of their
food, clothing, accommodation, leisure, amusements, etc.—is
determined not by prices or taxes but by capitalist pressure as a
whole and the workers' powers of organised resistance to it. No
juggling with taxes or prices or social reforms will alter the main
position—that of a subject class trying to defend itself against a
dominant class—or will free the workers from poverty and
insecurity. Don't be misled by the movements to alter the amount or
nature of taxes and Budget expenditure. The aim, or at any rate, the
effect, is merely to remove a burden from one section of the
capitalists and place it on another. It is a capitalist fight, so
keep out. Concentrate, instead, on abolishing capitalism. The
defenders of capitalism who claim that inequality has disappeared or
is diminishing have not the shadow of a case.
“Who
are the people? The people are the working class, the lower class,
the robbed, the oppressed, the impoverished, the great majority of
the earth. They and those who sympathize with them are THE PEOPLE,
and they who exploit the working class, and the mercenaries and
menials who aid and abet the exploiters, are the enemies of the
people.” - Eugene Debs
No comments:
Post a Comment