A
few in the climate change campaign movements advocate a society based
on cooperation and production for use, a sustainable society where
production is in harmony with the environment and affairs are run in
a decentralised and democratic manner. Like ourselves, they argue
that only in such a system can ecological problems such as pollution
and global warming be solved. Unless others embrace socialism, this
vision is unachievable. Too many people environment protesters still
believe there is no alternative to capitalism and so it will keep on
existing and our mutula aspiration for a just ‘zero growth’
steady-state economy will remain unfulfilled.
If
society is to be able to organise its production in an ecologically
acceptable way, then it must abolish the capitalist economic
mechanism of capital accumulation and gear production instead to the
direct satisfaction of needs. The over-consumption of resources and
the release of GHG emissions that nature can’t absorb is an
inevitable result of capitalism’s very essence. The capitalist
system creates vast amounts of waste in the military and many other
socially useless jobs which are part of its profit-making machine.
Endless growth and the growing consumption of materials is built
into capitalism. To achieve a zero growth, sustainable society whilst
retaining a market system is simply not possible for there exists an
irresistible commercial pressure to increase sales for profit and
if sales collapse, the economy breaks down into recession and
financial crisis leading to unemployment and austerity cuts.
Legislative measures in favour of the environment come up against the
interests of enterprises and their shareholders because by increasing
costs they decrease profits. Capitalist businesses take notice of
the calamitous condition of the environment only when the damage has
been done.
It
is only after having placed the means of society’s existence under
the control of the community that we will be able to at last ensure
their management in the general interest of all and no longer for
the benefit of their present owners. When land, resources and
factories are owned communally and controlled democratically, there
will be no them-and-us. We will then be capable of integrating
ourselves into a stable eco-system on the basis of today's
technology such as the renewable energies of wind, solar, tidal,
geothermal etc. but, for the capitalists, these come at a “cost”
which penalises them in face competition and in their relentless
quest for profits. is possible. It is the capitalist economic system
itself which is responsible for ecological problems.
Seen
solely from a technical point of view there are many ways in which
the damage caused to the environment could be eliminated or reduced.
But before any of these can become real options to be implemented
people themselves must first be liberated to freely make democratic
decisions. What is required is political action - political action
aimed at replacing this system by a new and different one. There can
be no justification, on any grounds whatsoever, for wanting to retain
an exploitative system which robs both the people and the planet and
puts class privileges before the needs of the community. Capitalism
governed by the overriding economic law of profits foremost, exhausts
the soil of its fertility, plunders nature of its resources and
destroys the natural systems on which all our lives depend.
To
those eco-activists who are still to become receptive to the need for
a radical transformation, we say a sustainable society can only be
achieved within the context of a world in which all the Earth's
resources, natural and industrial, have become the common heritage,
under democratic control at local, regional and world level, of all
humanity. In such a society production and distribution can be geared
to satisfying human needs which, contrary to conventional wisdom, are
not limitless and can be fully met without over-stretching nature’s
resources.
An excellent post, naturally.
ReplyDeleteI would suggest one addition [in brackets] to this sentence:
"Unless others embrace socialism, [or consensus anarchism,] this vision is unachievable."