Around the world, more than 2,400 coal power plants are now
under construction or being planned, experts say. Two-thirds of those are in
China and India - both countries already struggling with growing deaths from
air pollution. Building even a third of those plants would push the world past
the international goal agreed in Paris last December to hold world temperature
increase to "well under" 2 degrees Celsius.
A coalition of development experts which includes the
Overseas Development Institute (ODI), and Oxfam International, have published a
new paper disputing the claims that cheap, dirty coal is somehow a solution to
extreme global poverty. The paper, Beyond Coal: scaling up clean energy to
fight global poverty (pdf), makes the case that in developing nations, coal has
been given "too much credit for the reduction of extreme poverty." In
fact, they argue coal is one of the major forces driving climate change, which
they say is "the greatest long-term threat to eradicating poverty."
They say the widespread use of coal has had a detrimental impact on poor
populations while at the same time contributing the most carbon emissions of
any fuel source, hastening dangerous climate change.
"The immediate human health impacts of coal in the
developing world are staggering, particularly for poor people who are the least
equipped to deal with the economic
burdens of illness, a premature death in the
household, or degraded water and land resources," the paper notes. Further,
climate change threatens "to undermine the productivity of both marine and
terrestrial food production systems, the main source of income for roughly 2.7
billion people in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia and
China."
The paper continues, "burning coal is also a major
driver of the greatest long-term threat to eradicating poverty: climate change." The report
cites a 2015 study by ODI which found that by 2050, climate change impacts
could draw an estimated 720 million people into extreme poverty. "This is
about the same number lifted out of extreme poverty in the last two decades and
would thus cancel out much of the progress made in poverty eradication to date."
In contrast, safe, renewable energy sources are
"abundant, increasingly reliable, and now cost-competitive with
coal," the report states. Further, "It can also be more flexibly
deployed and offers greater employment potential. It improves energy security
and [...] can deliver energy services to the poorest."
"There are myths that we're trying to pull up the
ladder and deny developing countries the chance to develop the way we
did," Sarah Wykes, report co-author and the lead analyst on climate change
and energy issues for Catholic Agency For Overseas Development (CAFOD), explained. "But you don't need these kinds of dirty fuels anymore for
economic development. There are much better clean alternatives."
World Bank President Jim Yong Kim has warned if Asia goes
ahead its planned coal plants, "I think we are finished. ... That would
spell disaster for our planet." The coal industry is a powerful and established
lobbying group, she said.
The coal industry has fought back against criticism, arguing that coal is the cheapest and most
reliable way to bring power to millions without it, claiming "clean
coal" technology offers emissions 25 to 40 percent lower than traditional
coal plants.
No comments:
Post a Comment