It’s quite amusing really. The Labour Party has long since
given up any opposition to capitalism and its profit-making and merely offers
itself as an alternative manager of the capitalist state and economy in
Britain.
Yet some capitalists and their mouthpieces in the media
don’t believe them – or feign not to – and accuse Labour of being
‘anti-business’. Labour politicians protest. And grovel, the worst example to
date being the historian Tristram Hunt, their spokesperson on education, who
wrote a rather disparaging biography of Engels. Under the headline ‘We’re
furiously pro-business, Labour MP tells private sector’, the Times (9 February)
reported him as saying.
‘I’m enormously enthusiastic about businessmen and women
making money, delivering shareholder return, about making profit’ (Times, 9
January).
Former Labour Leader Neil Kinnock was not so gushing but
still reassured business corporations that Labour was not proposing to increase
the tax on their profits:
‘Lord Kinnock also said that the business world has nothing
to fear from Labour.”Nobody’s talking about raising corporation tax”, he said.’
(Times, 18 February)
There is a certain logic in this position. If you accept
capitalism and that productive activity under it is driven by the need for
firms to make a profit, then you have to accept that they should, and not do
anything that might discourage or endanger this. Otherwise you will provoke an
economic downturn.
Not that anything Labour is saying or proposing to do is
anti-business or anti-profit. Miliband might have been unable to disguise his
boredom when meeting capitalists but the most Labour has done is to criticise
and say that they will put a stop to the practices that some capitalists and
capitalist firms have engaged in to boost their profits such as tax-dodging,
customer-cheating, supplier-bullying and market-rigging. This is to go no
further than Ted Heath, when as Tory Prime Minister in 1973 he labelled one
action of the businessman Tiny Rowland as the ‘unacceptable face of
capitalism’.
Which of course is not a criticism of capitalism as such but
merely of the way some capitalists behave, a criticism that can be shared by
other capitalists such as that of tax-dodging capitalist firms by other firms
which don’t have the chance to do this and so have to pay more tax. Though
Hunt, with his enthusiasm for profits not just as the driving force of the
capitalist economy but also as ‘delivering shareholder return,’ can’t logically
complain about this because the various sharp practices that capitalist firms
engage in do increase ‘shareholder return’, at least in the short run, and are engaged in precisely to do this.
That the Labour Party is in any way anti-capitalist,
anti-business or anti-profit is a joke as the capitalists who are raising this
spectre must know full well. Labour has
thoroughly absorbed enterprise culture.
Your Top Ten
Your Top Ten
Jacqueline Shodeke - Brighton Kemptown;
Howard Pilott - Brighton Pavilion;
Robert Cox – Canterbury;
Steve Colborn – Easington;
Andy Thomas - Folkestone and Hythe;
Bill Martin - Islington North;
Kevin Parkin - Oxford East;
Mike Foster - Oxford West and Abingdon
Brian Johnson - Swansea West;
Danny Lambert – Vauxhall.
Who can forget the then Labour minister Peter Mandelson’s comment that he was "intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich"
ReplyDeleteWhich was recently echoed by Chuka Umunna, Labour shadow business minister who remarked, "I don’t have a problem with people making a lot of money”
Labour's capitalist millionaires:
ReplyDeleteLord Sainsbury worth £400m, Lord Grantchester worth £80m, Lord Drayson worth £75m, Tony Blair worth £30m, Margaret Hodge worth £18m, Shaun Woodward worth £15m, Geoffrey Robinson worth £10m, Ed Miliband and Ed Balls and other shadow cabinet members are millionaires.
hat tip Vin