Actions, of course, speak louder than words and the rhetoric
of US conservatism seems ever more divorced from its behavior.
For example:
1. As opponents of “big government,” why do you fervently
support an unending stream of government-sponsored wars, vast government
military spending, the power of local police to shoot and kill unarmed
citizens, government interference with abortion rights and family planning,
government restrictions on marriage, and the linkage of church and state?
2. As advocates of “consumer sovereignty,” why do you oppose
requiring corporations to label their products with information (for example,
“contains GMOs”) that would enable consumers to make an intelligent choice of
products?
3. As advocates of personal advancement through individual
effort, why do you oppose inheritance taxes that would place the children of
rich and poor on a more equal footing in their struggle for personal success?
4. As advocates of capitalist competition in the
marketplace, why do you so consistently support the interests of giant
corporations over those of small businesses?
5. As advocates of the “private enterprise system,” why do
you so often favor government subsidies to failing big businesses and tax
breaks to thriving big businesses that you desire to lure into your state or
region?
6. As advocates of freedom to choose to work for an employer
(“freedom of contract”), why do you oppose employees’ right to stop working for
that employer―that is, to strike―and particularly to strike against the
government?
7. As advocates of voluntary (rather than government) action
to redress grievances, why do you so fervently oppose labor unions?
8. As advocates of the free movement of labor and capital,
why do you support government immigration restrictions, including the
construction of enormous walls, the massive policing of borders, and the
building of mass incarceration centers?
9. As "critics" of statism, why don’t you oppose government
loyalty oaths, flag drills, and pledges of allegiance?
10. As advocates of “freedom,” why are you not at the
forefront of the fight against government torture, political surveillance, and
censorship?
We have very good reason to conclude that the professed
principles of conservatives are no more than a respectable mask behind which
lurk less admirable motives―for example, that support for wars and military spending
reflects a desire to dominate the world and its resources, that support for
police shoot-to-kill policies and crackdowns on immigrants reflects hostility
toward racial minorities, that opposition to abortion rights and family
planning reflects hostility toward women, that support for government meddling
in religious matters reflects hostility toward religious minorities and
nonbelievers, that opposition to product labeling, indifference to small
businesses, subsidies to big businesses, and opposition to strikes and unions
reflect a loyalty to corporations, that opposition to inheritance taxes
reflects an alliance with the wealthy, and that support for nationalist hoopla,
torture, surveillance, and censorship reflects a repressive, authoritarian mentality.
In short, that the real goal of conservatives is the maintenance of economic,
gender, racial, and religious privilege, with no scruples about the means of
maintaining it.
And of course, the right stand for law and order so why did Tea Party Republican Senator Rand Paul introduced a bill Wednesday, which proposes to immediately cut Washington's aid to Palestinians, unless they halt their effort to join the International Criminal Court.
ReplyDeleteThe United States and Israel, along with Sudan, are not part of the ICC, meaning they have no legal obligations to the 122-member court.