Land-grab and land-ownership concentration sometimes appears
to be solely a problem for the undeveloped world of Africa and Asia. This article
concentrates on drawing attention to the problem in Europe, itself. Just like
their counterparts in Ethiopia, Cambodia or Paraguay, all these large-scale
land deals are being carried out in a secretive, non-transparent manner. As
elsewhere, the “grabbers” are foreign and domestic companies, with the apparent
participation of regional European capital, including both traditional
agribusiness controlling commodity chains and finance capital including pension
funds – not unlike in Latin America or Southeast Asia. Land is being grabbed
across Europe for multiple reasons: production of raw materials for the food
industry dominated by transnational companies, extractive industry, bio-energy,
“green grabs” such as vast solar greenhouses, urban sprawl, real estate
interests, tourism enclaves, and other commercial undertakings.
Land ownership in Europe has become highly unequal reaching,
in some countries, proportions similar to Brazil, Colombia and the Philippines
– all notorious for their unequal distribution of land and land-based wealth.
While in the EU there are some 12 million farms, the large farms (100 hectares
and above) that only represent 3 percent of the total number of farms, control
50 percent of all farmed land.
In Germany, for example, a total of 1,246,000 holdings in
1966/67 shrunk to just 299,100 farms by 2010. Of these holdings, the land area
covered by farms of less than 2 hectares, shrunk from 123,670 hectares in 1990
to a mere 20,110 hectares in 2007, while farms of 50 hectares and larger
expanded in area from 9.2 million hectares in 1990 to 12.6 million hectares in
2007.
In Eastern Europe, the concentration of land ownership has
been particularly marked since the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Many farmers
were bankrupted when their countries entered the EU and highly subsidised
agricultural products began flooding their markets. In the first six years, the
majority of small farmers were not even eligible to apply for EU agricultural
subsidies which fuelled sales of farms. Here a new elite group of
speculators/investors have succeeded in capturing vast tracts of land.
In Ukraine the 10 biggest agro-holdings control about 2.8
million ha, while some oligarchs own up to several hundreds of thousands of
hectares each.
In Serbia the four
largest Serbian landowners together allegedly control more than 100,000 ha.
In France each year more than 60,000 ha of agricultural land
are lost to make space for roads, supermarkets and urban growth or leisure
parks. These are often more scattered cases of usually smaller land deals. But
they add up, and also tend to encroach into the most fertile and productive
agricultural lands.
Chinese companies in Bulgaria undertaking large-scale
production of maize, of Middle Eastern companies in Romania embarking on
large-scale production of grains, and of European companies involved in
grabbing up land in many European countries for a variety of agricultural and
non-agricultural purposes.
The Common Agricultural Policy, supports the concentration
of land and wealth. In Italy, for example, in 2011, 0.29 percent of farms
accessed 18 percent of total CAP incentives, and 0.0001 of these (that is 150
farms) cornered 6 percent of all subsidies. In Spain in 2009, 75 percent of the
subsidies were cornered by only 16 percent of the largest farmers. In Hungary
in 2009, 8.6 percent of farms cornered 72 percent of all agricultural
subsidies. Currently, the CAP subsidy scheme is being changed to subsidies per
hectare of farm land. Unintended consequences of this might be that it further
fuels the European land grab in the Eastern and Mediterranean parts of Europe,
as it will marginalise small farms, and continue to block entry by prospective
farmers. The harsh reality of European agricultural policies means that these
future farmers are either losing small plots of land or being denied entry. The
winners of the growing land concentration and creeping land grab are large
industrial farm-holdings, clinging to a system of agriculture that has
significant environmental and social costs.
An article on the land grab in China may interest some people.
ReplyDeletehttp://libcom.org/blog/china-land-grabs
No part of the globe is immune. Even in Canada and US, farmers either die or retire and their farms leave the family. There is no following generation and the land is sold and falls into the ownership of the corporations