This post has been re-blogged from the Sussex Sedition blogspot HERE, with permission of the blogger.
There are many decisions this idiot government has made that have
affected the lives of the young. The housing benefit cap and the
reduction in child tax credits have undermined the stability of children
and families; the scrapping of the Building Schools for the Future
programme and the sell-off of playing fields have reined in
opportunities available to schoolchildren; and the raising of university
tuition fees has restricted access to higher education. All of these
have impacted on the start in life of countless young people; but the
latest stupid move by the government has probably had the most immediate
and pernicious effect of all.
This week’s GCSE results have
revealed that the exam boards, under instruction from the regulator
Ofqual, moved the grade boundaries for students sitting English between
the January and May exams, without notifying schools. The result of this
is that across the country, there are countless students who scored the
same marks in May as their contemporaries did in January, but they have
received a lower grade. The most marked effect of this has been on
students who were expected to get a C grade and have now been awarded a D
grade. Entry to sixth forms and colleges is dependent on at least a C
grade in English and Maths. At the school in East Sussex where I teach
English there are ten students who have been awarded a D grade when
their marks were well within the grade boundary that would have secured a
C grade in January. I understand that the position in some other
schools across the county is a lot worse; this means that there are
hundreds of young people in East Sussex whose immediate next steps in
life have been severely affected at a stroke.
This has been done
in the name of curbing grade inflation because it is widely accepted
that GCSE students cannot continue to improve year after year. But why
not? Why cannot success be extended to as many as possible? Because this
is the nasty party and for people like Michael Gove equality of
opportunity is anathema. And he can plead innocence as much as he likes
but there has undoubtedly been government pressure brought to bear; I
saw him on the news and he closed his eyes at the point he said he had
not instructed Ofqual - sure sign of a lie. Years of improving state
education and increasing numbers going to university have to be rolled
back by the Tories. As Gore Vidal said, “it is not enough to succeed,
others must fail”. Or, in other words, the lower orders must know their
place.
The Sedonista
With respect, the last tories government, under thatcher, stated that education was expensive, that britian plc, didn't need well educated workers, and that new jobs would be in the service sector. It would be a waste of money, and workers who had been given well educated, would feel bitter and anger, doing useless toil on low wages jobs. After 13 years of 'new labour' who didn't change policy, to talk of better exam results, based largely based on very low results, isn't saying much! education for what? YFS
ReplyDeleteEducation for what? For knowledge, understanding and forming your own ideas; it can't just be about the job it leads to.
ReplyDeleteWith equal respect, I believe Sedonista was clear in the blog post above about the points being raised, namely that this change was unannounced and therefore adversely affected the youngsters involved - a deliberate, nasty moving of the goalposts for ulterior motives. And secondly, these motives are not because either Tory or Labour have made a decent education system but that the Labour policies although heavily flawed had incidentally allowed a number of people from poorer backgrounds to 'succeed' within the limits of the current educational system. This is clearly not something the Tories want to see continued.
ReplyDeleteHowever, as Socialists we can see through the lot and understand that in the main education as it stands is essentially training to become good workers within the capitalist system. However, this is a sweeping generalisation that often misses the individual interactions between students and teachers, many of whom are socialists and also see through the system as it is. Education has many facets and really is worthy of a longer more in depth article.