The Rockefellers

The current patriarch and grandchild of Robber Baron J.D. Rockefeller is 93 years old today. David with a $2.7 billion fortune to his name can celebrate with style. With such a mind bogglingly huge stash of loot it is little wonder that he follows family tradition and calls himself a philanthropist ($900 million and counting to 'good' causes). Such activity has not passed without socialist comment. For example, The Socialist Standard of July 1960 on the death of David's father after 86 years of parasitical privilege. had the following to say:

On the 11th of May there died in Tuscson, Arizona, John D. Rockefeller, Jnr., son of that notable father, John D. Snr., a man well-known in the early capitalist era as one of the Robber Barons, with a finger in many pies - coal, iron ore, but chiefly remembered for his control of Standard Oil (New Jersey). In fact, according to Victor Perle in his book American Imperialism, in 1949 Standard Oil handled one-fifth of the oil produced in the western hemisphere, and its marketing areas covered countries in which some 72 per cent of the world's population resided. The control of oil throughout the western world is in the hands of seven oil trusts, of which the Rockefellers control three.

But the Rockefellers, according to the obituaries of "Junior," were noted for their "beneficence." It is reputed that between them they gave away some £350 million, and were still able to leave, as reports have shown, £200 millions (senior) and £150 millions (junior). These are staggering sums of money. And "Junior's" will make no mention of any settlement for his six children and their various offspring, so it must be presumed that they have been well provided for. Some readers may say, but at least they gave some away, for the Daily Telegraph, May 12, reports that "He devoted himself to furthering the schemes for human betterment initiated by his father after establishing his fortune." What from our point of view is important, however, is to whom it was given and why. Part of the answer to the first point is contained in the Telegraph of the 12th. "Educational Organisations benefited the most." It seems highly probable that Marxian economics and the Labour Theory of Value plays no part in these "Educational Organisations," for remember, education as taught today is primarily to fit workers into the productive and administrative organisation of capitalism and not to teach them Socialism.

Next comes "Religion," another barrier to working class emancipation. The "Public Parks, Roads, and the restoration and historic structures and antiquities." No doubt the workers of the slum dwellings of all the major cities in the USA will appreciate that they can walk in the parks and pray in a well-restored church. Lastly, "Great sums to youth." How this was distributed was not mentioned, but it is unlikely that these funds were used to propagate Socialist ideas. They were obviously spent to eulogise and bolster the capitalist system.

So, as commendable as some people may think was his "beneficence," it is interesting to note that the people from whom this wealth was expropriated, his own workers, received little or nothing of what was rightfully theirs. Why he gave away these vast sums of money is a matter of some conjecture. One reason surely was to avoid taxation, but possibly also to buy immortality.

Socialists hope that in the not too distant future, people will see these so-called philanthropists in their true light - of leeches who grow fat on the mental and physical energies of the working class. Although "Junior" is dead, the Rockefeller Empire will continue, for neither father, son nor children ever took part in the production of things for use. At least it will continue to flourish until workers decide to own and distribute the fruits of their labour themselves."

J.P.E.