Friday 10 May 19.30 (GMT + 1)
*WHAT IS POLITICS?*
*Guest speaker: Darren Poynton*
To join the meeting click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305
Friday 10 May 19.30 (GMT + 1)
*WHAT IS POLITICS?*
*Guest speaker: Darren Poynton*
To join the meeting click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305
Cross Purposes
Polling
stations are closed, ballot boxes
Collected,
votes totalled, winners declared.
Capitalism
has again been spared
Serious
challenge as suffrage locks us
Once more
into the status quo. The cross
Has been the
mark of illiterates,
Also the
spot where buried treasure waits
To be revealed.
Votes are precious because
Potentially
they could well change the way
The world is
now to what it could become,
Fashioned
for the benefit of all, not just some.
That’ll be a
red-letter election day,
When all the
old parties of left and right
Are voted
down as the workers unite.
D. A.
The Guardian, 3 May, reports that ,‘More than 2,000 pro-Palestinian protesters arrested across US campuses.’
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/02/university-protests-arrests-ucla-dartmouth
The
Guardian,
29 April, reports that, pressure is being applied to the
International Criminal Court not to press war crime charges against
Israel.
The
USA is particularly opposed to this the ICC proceeding with this.
‘US diplomats at the UN insisted that Washington regarded the ICC as independent and it would not be interfering in its decision-making process. The US and Israel do not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC, which is vested with the task of prosecuting war crimes.
According to a report on the Axios news website, Netanyahu has appealed to Biden to intervene to stop the warrants being issued. The US is not a member of the court, but under the Trump administration it sanctioned court officials after complaining about its investigations of US military operations in Afghanistan and Israeli actions in the occupied Palestinian territories.
Asked about the prospect of ICC warrants, the White House spokesperson, Karine Jeanne-Pierre, said: “We’ve been really clear about the ICC investigation. We don’t support it; we don’t believe that they have the jurisdiction.”
US politicians spoke out, with the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, saying: “Such a lawless action by the ICC would directly undermine US national security interests. If unchallenged by the Biden administration, the ICC could create and assume unprecedented power to issue arrest warrants against American political leaders, American diplomats, and American military personnel, thereby endangering our country’s sovereign authority.”
Democratic senator John Fetterman warned: “It would be a fatal blow to the judicial and moral standing of ICC to pursue this path against Israel.” He said he was calling on Joe Biden to intervene as part of the administration’s ongoing commitment to Israel.’
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/apr/29/icc-possible-war-crimes-charges-israel-hamas-g7
Other news outlets are describing the American’s attitude of one of menacing bullying with the threat of retaliation by the USA if such charges are brought forth.
The Axios site headlines the story, ‘Congress threatens ICC over Israeli arrest warrants.’
https://www.axios.com/2024/04/29/icc-congress-netanyahu-israel-gaza
The Socialist Party is opposed to global capitalism and does not favour any capitalist nationalists over any other. The Socialist party deplores and condemns armed conflict wherever in the world it occurs because members of working class are always te ones to suffer the most from capitalists power struggles for competitive advantages. American capitalism has a long history of using its power to quash both internal and external opposition to the interests of its ruling elites.
That individuals possess the social conscience to oppose such grievous abuses of power is to be applauded. However, until the majority recognise that it is capitalism that is inherently responsible for such abuses against humankind and will continue to do until it is replaced by socialism is the lesson that needs to be learned most quickly.
SOYMB posted, 5 May:
Following the mayoral and local elections,
capitalism remains in power!
https://socialismoryourmoneyback.blogspot.com/2024/05/flash-point-1.html
To use a social media idiom, this makes a Socialist respond SMH.
Wasn't it Einstein who said something about insanity repeating the same actions over and over and expecting a different result every time?
The Socialist Party will continue to educate those who mistakenly believe that capitalism provides the best of all possible worlds.
Our object remains, The establishment of a system of society based upon the common ownership and democratic control of the means and instruments for producing and distributing wealth by and in the interest of the whole community.
From the Socialist Standard November 1973
Marx and the 1st InternationalI was obliged to insert two phrases about “duty” and “right” into the Preamble to the Statutes, ditto “truth, morality and justice”, but these are placed in such a way that they can do no harm.
Everywhere the great mass of the working class sank into ever deeper misery to the same extent as the upper class rose in the social scale. In all the countries of Europe it is now an irrefutable fact, undeniable for every unprejudiced enquirer and denied only by those who have an interest in awakening deceptive hopes in others, that neither the perfection of machinery nor the application of science to industry and agriculture, neither the resources and artifices of communication, neither the conquests of new markets nor free trade, or all these things combined can succeed in abolishing the misery of the working class, and that on the contrary, every new development of the creative power of labour is calculated on the false bases of existing conditions to intensify the social antagonisms and aggravate the social conflict. During this intoxicating period economic progress, starvation raised itself almost to the level of a social institution in the capital of the British Empire. The period is characterised in the annals of history by accelerated return, the extended compass and the deadly effects of the social pest known as industrial and commercial crises.
And therefore the Ten-Hour Bill was not only a great practical success, but also a victory of a principle; for the first time the political economy of the bourgeoisie was defeated by the political economy of the working class.
They possess an element of success — numbers. But numbers are weighty in the scales only when they are united in an organization and led towards a conscious aim.
One day the working class must hold political power in its hands in order to establish a new organization of labour. It must overthrow the old political system which maintains the old institutions in being, unless it wishes, like the old Christians, who despised and neglected such action, to renounce “the Kingdom of the World”.
From the Socialist Standard October1973
Yet when it was written we could not have called it a Socialist Manifesto. By Socialists in 1847 were understood, on the one hand, the adherents of the various Utopian systems: Owenites in England, Fourierists in France, both of them reduced to the position of mere sects, and gradually dying out; on the other hand, the most multifarious social quacks, who, by all manners of tinkering, professed to redress, without any danger to capital and profit, all sorts of social grievances — in both cases men outside the working-class movement, and looking rather to the "Educated” classes for support. Whatever portion of the working class has become convinced of the insufficiency of mere political revolutions, and had proclaimed the necessity of a total social change, that portion, then, called itself communist.
And our notion from the very beginning was that "the emancipation of the working class must be the act of the working class itself”.
The Manifesto being our joint production, I feel bound to state that the fundamental proposition which forms the nucleus, belongs to Marx. That proposition is that in every historical epoch, the prevailing mode of economic production and exchange, and the social organisation necessarily following from it, forms the basis upon which is built up, and from which alone can be explained, the intellectual history of that epoch.
However much the state of things may have altered during the last 25 years, the general principles laid down in this Manifesto are, on the whole, as correct today as ever. Here and there some detail might be improved. The practical application of the principles will depend, as the Manifesto itself states, everywhere and at all times on the historical conditions for the time being existing, and, for that reason, no special stress is laid on the revolutionary measures proposed at the end of section II. That passage would in many respects be very differently worded today.
https://socialismoryourmoneyback.blogspot.com/2020/05/remembering-kent-state.html
'More than 1,400 people have been arrested across the US during a week of intense police crackdowns on a sprawling campus movement of pro-Palestine student demonstrations.
As Joe Biden defended students’ free speech rights but warned them that “dissent must never lead to disorder”, colleges across the country brought law enforcement to campus to arrest dozens or even hundreds of protesters and clear away their encampments.
But the level of force with which some of these law enforcement agencies have responded to protests, which in the overwhelming majority of cases have been peaceful.' The Guardian 4 May
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/04/police-tactics-us-campus-protest-crackdowns
Fifty four years on and students, and others, are still protesting at the killing of innocent people in armed conflicts.
In 1965, folk singer Donovan's song Universal Soldier propounding the idea that if soldiers refused to fight for their countries ten they would be no more war.
His lyrics concluded with ,'He's the universal soldier, and he really is to blame His orders come from far away no more They come from here and there and you and me And brothers can't you see This is not the way we put the end to war?'
The only way to put an end to war is for you and me to realise that it's not te universal soldier wo is to blame, it's capitalism. And things will only change when we universally decide to replace capitalism wit socialism.
THE SOCIALIST PARTY AGAINGST ALL WAR
We keep hearing about ‘neoliberalism’ (where private firms operate with little or no government interference, meaning increased insecurity for workers) as though it were something new. It isn’t. It was practised through the 19th and a good part of the 20th century, when it was simply called the free market.
For a time governments changed tack and practised increased intervention to try and ‘tame’ capitalism – to make it less prone to crises. It didn’t work so they moved back to what they had before, except they gave it a new name: neoliberalism.
But it’s not neoliberalism that’s the problem, it’s capitalism. It’s not a change of policy that’s required, but a change of socio-economic system.
To connect to a meeting, click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305
To connect to a meeting, click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305
Crossing the Floor
Divided, it
seems, by just two sword lengths
Are green
benched Capulets and Montagues,
Who, in
vitriolic rivalry stew
As vexed
ambition flexes its strength.
Whether
feeling neglected, rejected
Or some
bitter sense of injured pride,
One crosses
the floor to the other side,
Where
greater rewards might be expected.
This act of
principle or betrayal
Is mitigated
by the growing sense
That it
makes little or no difference,
As every
Commons cause is doomed to fail.
No matter
what the rivals do or say,
Capital
profits, and must have its way.
D. A.
Clerkenwell Green, EC 1 (12 noon) (nearest tube: Farringdon)
Trafalgar Square (13.00)
The Socialist Party will have a stall at this event
‘Republic First Bancorp was seized by Pennsylvania regulators Friday, following a failed deal earlier this year to infuse the Philadelphia-based regional bank with new funds, amid a decline in deposits and a struggling mortgage lending business.’
From the Socialist Standard, December 2008
‘’One thing that the current banking crisis has done is to explode the myth about banks being able to create credit, i.e. money to lend out at interest, by a mere stroke of the pen. Events have clearly confirmed that banks are financial intermediaries which can only lend out either what has been deposited with them or what they have themselves borrowed or their own reserves. As the US Federal Reserve put it in one of its educational documents:
“Banks borrow funds from their depositors (those with savings) and in turn lend those funds to the banks’ borrowers (those in need of funds). Banks make money by charging borrowers more for a loan (a higher percentage interest rate) than is paid to depositors for use of their money.” (Dead Link. p. 57)
Actually, banks don’t just borrow from individual depositors, or “retail”. They also borrow “wholesale” from the money market. It is in fact the difficulties they have experienced here that has revealed that they cannot create credit out of nothing.
Because some banks had burnt their fingers by buying securities based on sub-prime mortgages in America, other banks were reluctant to lend on the money market for fear that the borrowing bank might turn out to be insolvent. Which meant that one source of money for the banks to re-lend to their customers had shrunk. Or at least had become too expensive as interest rates had risen too high compared with the rate banks could charge their borrowers to allow them to make a profit or enough profit. So, deprived of this source of money, the banks had less to lend out themselves. Which of course wouldn’t have been a problem if they really did have the power to create money to lend out of nothing.
But at least one person was unable to see what should have been obvious. On 15 October the Times printed a letter from a Malcolm Parkin, in which he wrote:
“Only 3 per cent of money exists as cash. Therefore the rest is magic money conjured into existence, and issued as debt by banks, at a ratio of about 33 magic pounds to 1 real pound, by the quite legal means of fractional reserve banking. In a rising market, it follows that anybody able to create such money, at such a ratio, can soon get rich.”
The “fractional reserve” he mentions is the proportion of retail deposits that a bank keeps as cash to handle likely withdrawals. Fifty years ago in Britain it was 8 percent. But, as banks resorted more and more to the wholesale money market to get money to relend, the percentage of cash to loans became almost irrelevant. Parkin’s figure of 3 percent is the percentage of cash banks hold compared to total loans, including those based on money borrowed from the money market (which even on his definition is not “magic money“).
What a “fractional reserve”, or “cash ratio”, of say, 10 percent means, is that if £100 is deposited in a bank that bank has to keep £10 as cash and can lend out £90. Parkin has misunderstood this to mean that a bank can lend out £900 – and charge interest on it. Easy money, as he says, if it were true. But it isn’t.
The theory of “fractional reserve banking” is that an initial deposit of £100 can lead to the whole banking system, but not a single bank, being able to make loans totalling £900. The argument is that the initial £90 will eventually be re-deposited in some bank (not necessarily the bank that made the loan), which can then lend out 90 percent of this, i.e. £81, which in turn will be re-deposited, and so on, until in the end a total of £900 has been loaned out.
This is theoretically the case as one of the key features of capitalism is that money circulates, but what the theorists never emphasise is that this is based on the assumption that the same money is used and re-used to create new deposits. If this does not happen then the process cannot work or continue. So, the banking system has not created any “magic money” out of nothing. It is still dependent on individual banks only being able to lend out what has been deposited with them or what they themselves have borrowed – they cannot magically lend out vast multiples of this, as poor Malcolm Parkin assumed.
https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2024/01/cooking-books-myth-of-magic-money-2008.html
Two historical examples of bread riots, one in France, one in Newbury,UK:
‘Bread was the basic staple of most people’s diets, and variations in the price of bread were keenly felt by the poor, especially by women who most frequently bought bread in the marketplace. Women would sometimes protest against what they thought to be unjust price increases for bread in what were known as "bread riots."... were a collective action designed to force bakers to sell bread at a "just" or "moral" price rather than at whatever price the market would allow.
(17 July 1725)—On Saturday the fourteenth, a baker of the faubourg Saint-Antoine seemingly tried to sell bread for thirty-four sous which that morning had cost thirty. The woman to whom this happened caused an uproar and called her neighbours. The people gathered, furious with bakers in general. Soon their numbers reached eighteen hundred, and they looted all the bakers' houses in the faubourg from top to bottom, throwing dough and flour into the gutter.’
https://revolution.chnm.org/items/show/491
‘The millers and bakers of the town and neighbourhood were the especial offenders, as notwithstanding the price of wheat was not immoderately high, they kept up the price of bread much in excess of what was fair and legitimate. At last the long subdued feeling of discontent found forcible expression. On a certain market day in August, during the time the sack of corn were being pitched for sale, the people broke out into wild riot.
Upsetting the open stalls, they flung themselves upon the scattered provisions, corn, meat, butter, and eggs, wrecked a couple of houses and so alarmed the bakers that they at once lowered the price of bread, and promised a further reduction. But the spirit of the mob was not easily to be managed. They proceeded to break into the mills, and throw the corn into the river; windows were broken, and damage to the extent of £1,000 was done. Several persons were injured in the fray, one of them fatally.
http://www.newburyhistory.co.uk/bread-riot
The following is from the Socialist Standard, May 1986.
‘Under capitalism food supplies are manipulated to increase profits regardless of the consequences to health. This is because food, like all other goods, is produced for its exchange-value and, therefore, supplied according to the dictates of the market instead of for social needs.
Profits
from agriculture are maximised in the following ways: destroying or
storing food when there is a surplus that cannot be sold at a profit,
regardless of the number of deaths from starvation or malnutrition;
cutting back on food production to prevent unsaleable surpluses in
subsequent harvests; farming land more intensively by using
artificial fertilisers and pesticides; extending the number of
processes which food undergoes.
Although
about a quarter of a million old people in Britain suffer from
malnutrition and there are obscene inequalities of wealth in the rest
of the population, generally speaking there is relative affluence
compared with underdeveloped countries and the problem for food
manufacturers is to try to persuade people to buy more in order that
the market can be expanded and profits increased. Normally
manufacturers can persuade the public to buy more by the skilful use
of advertising, playing on the fears and insecurity of consumers in
an aggressively competitive, acquisitive society. But food presents a
greater problem because, beyond the level of satiety. people do not
eat more as a result of increased wealth. Nevertheless, profits can
be increased by extending the number of processes which food
undergoes and adulterating it with cheaper additives.
In
1969 a Lancet editorial pointed out that, on
average, three pounds of chemical additives a year were consumed in
food by each person in this country and that the number of additives
exceeded 20,000, but by 1985 this number had increased to 35.000 and
the consumption of additives was a staggering 8-11 pounds a year!
Indeed, a new term — 'junk-food' has been coined to describe the
artificially flavoured, highly processed food that is increasingly
consumed today. Additives are used to provide colouring, enhance
flavour, inhibit mould, emulsify, sweeten and provide uniformity of
ingredients in the products sold.
The
extent of the profits that can be made from expanding the processes
which food undergoes can be seen in the sale of potato crisps which
cost forty or fifty times more than the same weight of potatoes. Fish
fingers and chickens are treated with polyphosphates (E450) to absorb
more water, while fish and prawns are dipped in water before being
frozen to increase their weight. It has been estimated that the
public pays nearly five million pounds a year for water! (Walker. C.
and Cannon. G. 1985. The Food Scandal, Century
Publishing). All of these practices are perfectly legal: the 1984
regulations only require water to be declared in uncooked cured meats
if it exceeds ten per cent.
The
addition of water alone in frozen fish and prawns has no detrimental
effects on health but polyoxyethylene monostearate, an emulsifier
used in bread to make flour absorb water, causes cancer in rats.
Cancers can be caused by some synthetic food colours. The use of
amaranth, a red food dye, is permitted in Britain although in 1970 a
Russian study showed that in its pure form it possesses carcinogenic
activity. Amaranth was banned in the USA in 1976. Its continued use
in Britain is a feature of additives in that there is a complete lack
of uniformity of products permitted or banned from one country to
another. Commercial considerations determine which additives are
permitted, however harmful, while public awareness of the dangers of
certain substances and consumer pressure in refusing to purchase
certain products restricts or modifies their continued use.
The
production of meat involves a number of processes which are
potentially injurious to health; milk and meat may become
contaminated from the routine doses of antibiotics given to cattle to
prevent infectious diseases. The modern methods of rearing cattle
cause them to be considerably fatter than wild game; the fat is also
higher in saturated fats, which contribute to heart disease. and
lower in polyunsaturated fats. But meat products present the greatest
threat to health. Profits are boosted by using hide, skin. bone,
preservatives and large amounts of fat in sausages. Most processed
meats not only contain preservatives and colouring but consist of two
or three per cent salt by weight while salami consists of as much as
five per cent salt. Processed meats and bacon contain nitrates which
interfere with the body's ability to convert carotene into vitamin A
and combine with amines, occurring naturally in food, to produce
nitrosamines which can cause cancer.
It
is estimated that about twenty times more salt (sodium chloride) is
ingested in this country than is needed for the maintenance of health
and that an excessive intake is, at least in part, a causative factor
in the production of high blood pressure. But salt is added to a wide
range of products besides processed meats, including cereals, tinned
vegetables. soups and bread.
Sodium
also occurs in the diet by the wide use of monosodium glutamate, a
flavour enhancer which permits smaller amounts of more expensive
foods to be used. It was also widely used in baby foods until a study
at Washington University in 1969 showed that in large doses it
damaged the brain cells of baby mice. As babies have a poorly
developed sense of taste its use was clearly directed at the mothers
who "tested" the food to ensure that it was suitable. The
publicity that resulted from the study led to some manufacturers (but
not all) withdrawing monosodium glutamate from their products. The
extensive use of monosodium glutamate in Chinese cooking can lead to
side-effects such as palpitations, general weakness, gall bladder
discomfort and numbness of the arms and the back of the neck and has
become known as the "Chinese Restaurant Syndrome".
Table
salt, itself, is not free from additives but may contain sodium
ferrocyanide and magnesium carbonate to prevent caking. In addition,
sodium is consumed in the form of sodium citrate in soft drinks. It
is, therefore, not surprising that a study in Scotland in the 45-64
age group found that one-fifth of them suffered from mild
hypertension.
Sugar
is an invaluable additive to the food manufacturer, it provides bulk
cheaply, preserves, thickens and sweetens. Every man. woman and child
in Britain consumes an average of two pounds of sugar a week. Tooth
decay, obesity, constipation, diverticulitis, gall bladder disease,
chronic digestive disorders and diabetes have all been implicated to
some degree with the excessive consumption of refined foods in
industrialised countries. By contrast. adult-onset diabetes is rare
in rural Africa where a diet high in unrefined carbohydrates is
eaten.
The food industry is also making more use of
dextrose in food: more than 16lbs of glucose (dextrose) a year, on
average, is consumed in processed foods. Fructose, a naturally
occurring sugar which is twice as sweet as sucrose (white sugar) has
been used in the food industry in the USA and could be an improvement
in health terms because only half the amount needs to be used. But
health needs under capitalism are always secondary to the requirement
of profitability and the Common Market placed an import quota on high
fructose com syrup to protect sugar beet production.
Highly
refined foods provide more calories, but less nutrients (unless
artificially added) and do not induce satiety as readily as unrefined
food, tending to lead to higher consumption with greater profits for
the manufacturers. White bread is made by the highly mechanised
Chorleywood Bread Process which avoids the hours of fermentation that
traditional bread requires. It also contains more air and water than
the traditional loaf as a result of using additives that are
potentially harmful. Polyoxyethylene monostearate, potassium bromate,
propionic acid, ammonium sulphate, chlorine dioxide, nitrosyl
chloride, benzoyle peroxide, sodium propionate. L-cysteine
hydrochloride and azodicarbonamide are all used in refined bread.
Agene was used for bleaching flour for nearly thirty years before it
was linked with nervous disorders in humans and in 1968, 600 people
in Johannesburg were poisoned by bread containing one per cent
potassium bromate (Grant. D., Your Daily Food, Faber
and Faber. 1973).
Even when additives are present in food
at what are considered to be "safe" levels there is still a
risk to health. The American Food and Drug Administration found that
two chemicals taken at the same time can enhance the effect of each
other; for example. silicone when used with an emulsifier makes the
cells of the gut more absorbent and susceptible to poisoning.
There
is also considerable contamination in food from the use of
insecticides. In 1984 the Association of Public Analysts found that
one third of fruit and vegetables were contaminated with DDT (despite
being banned), aldrin (a carcinogen), dimethoate and
mevinphos.
Although consumer pressure has resulted in a
few dangerous substances being withdrawn from food the number of
additives used has increased considerably in the last twenty years.
Additives will continue to be used while it is profitable to do so.
Only a socialist society which puts people first can stop the threat
to health which capitalism imposes.’
Carl Pinel
https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2020/05/fit-for-consumption-1986.html