Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Iran's Poverty

In Iran, about 85 percent of its people are horribly poor, while five percent are wealthy. As economic and trade sanctions ease, the gap – that should have narrowed – widens. The increased revenue only seems to have made the rich richer and the poor poorer. According to the IMF, 53 percent of Iranians still live below the poverty line

According to the Statistical Center of Iran (SCI), most Iranians earn about $450 a month, barely enough to cover utilities and a one-room apartment in Tehran. Since there is only one major industry, there are a limited number of jobs for workers to fill, so unemployment mushrooms. It leapt from 12.40 percent in the first Quarter of this year to 12.60 percent only seven months later, according to the business website Trading Economics. The minimum wage, set at 930 thousand tomans, drives people to juggle two to three jobs to survive. 

Iran has always had its oil resorces to bail it out, but, over the last three years, the price of oil has stagnated making the oil reserves worth significantly less. Even if that were not the case, the flow of oil money only benefits the top ruling officials and the wealthy business class connected to it.

Bad Medicine

 Trade in fake medicines is a $30 billion business. One in 10 drugs sold in developing countries is fake or substandard, leading to tens of thousands of deaths, many of them of African children given ineffective treatments for pneumonia and malaria, health officials said.

The World Health Organization (WHO) said that bogus drugs are a growing threat as increased pharmaceutical trade, including Internet sales, open the door to sometimes toxic products. Fake drugs could contain incorrect doses, wrong ingredients or no active ingredients at all. At the same time, a worrying number of authorised medicines fail to meet quality standards because of improper storage and other issues. Poor-quality drugs also add to the danger of antibiotic resistance, threatening to undermine the power of life-saving medicines in future.
Some pharmacists in Africa, for example, say that they are compelled to buy from the cheapest but not necessarily the safest suppliers to compete with illegal street traders. Sub-Saharan Africa accounted for 42 percent of all the reports. 
WHO calculated that up to 72,000 deaths from childhood pneumonia could be attributed to the use of antibiotics with reduced activity, increasing to 169,000 deaths if drugs had no activity. Another group from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine estimated that 116,000 additional deaths from malaria could be caused each year by bad antimalarials in sub-Saharan Africa.
"Substandard and falsified medicines particularly affect the most vulnerable communities," said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. "This is unacceptable."

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Hungry Britain

One-third of food grown globally is never eaten – representing a waste of land, water and resources. More than 400 million meals’ worth of edible food was sent to landfill in 2016 in the UK which could have been redistributed to feed hungry people. While many families struggle to put food on the table, supermarkets, food manufacturers and households across the country waste a massive 10 million tons of food each year – much of it still perfectly edible.

Eight million people in Britain –  the world’s sixth largest economy – are living in food poverty, according to the United Nations (UN). And an estimated 870,000 children in England may be going to bed hungry each night because their parents are unable to provide the meals they need.


But not eating isn’t the only problem – access to nourishing and nutrient-filled food is simply out of reach for thousands of families living on the breadline, with far-reaching consequences for too many of Britain’s children. 
Dr George Grimble, a medical scientist at University College London, said the situation was “disastrous” for developing children, resulting in malnourishment, obesity and squandered potential.  “When people are in poverty they are forced to buy the cheapest foods – filling but nutrient-lacking food,” Dr Grimble told The Independent. “Food poverty in the community overlays to a large extent on disease malnutrition.”
60 per cent of paediatricians believe food insecurity contributed to the ill health among children they treat, according to a 2017 survey by the Royal College of Paediatricians and Child Health. 

The Socialist Versus the Vote Catcher. (Short story 1924)

A Short Story from the November 1924 issue of the Socialist Standard


Some few years ago, in the suburb known as Battenham, there lived a poor workman . whose name was Hyam Eezi. He was poor in that his clothing was shoddy, his food coarse and adulterated, his habitation mean, inconvenient and hired by the week, his hold upon life so precarious that starvation or pauperism were ever on the horizon. He owned no land: nor anything beyond the rags upon his back and the few articles of utility with which he had furnished his hired house.

He himself lived by letting himself upon hire, the process being as follows. Being possessed of nothing material beyond the few poor articles mentioned, and driven by the stern goad of hunger, he found that he still possessed one saleable thing—his energy. He had read no history, so he did not know how he and those around him had become landless, propertyless outcasts in a land of plenty. He just took things as he found them, and imagined that thus they had ever been, and thus would remain. And so his main concern was to find some hirer of human labour, and lend his services to him for as long a time as possible and for as large a sum as possible. Unfortunately he found that so many hundreds of those around him were in like case, that the hirers were enabled to select those who would take the smallest sum, or alternatively those who could work the hardest or most skilfully. He, therefore, found that, no matter how hard he worked or at what occupation, the sum he received each week barely sufficed to keep him and his family in their poor standard of “comfort” and security. Security! Ever before him there loomed the prospect of finding in his pay envelope a little slip of paper, bearing the dread intimation that his services were no longer necessary. What puzzled him, when he really did sit down to think the matter out, was the undoubted fact that when he and his mates had worked so hard that the warehouses were overflowing with goods, then was the most likely time for the “sack,”'as they called it. Terms like "over-production,” “slump,” "glutted markets,” etc., filtered down to him, but he had but the haziest idea of what they all meant. The hunt for a master began anew. Presently he found one; or after an interval of semi-starvation the old one took him back again. The process is repeated, and so the years pass.

And then a great excitement stirs his drab life. There is an Election. Certain shiny-hatted, sleek, comfortable looking gentlemen appear, and profess to take an absorbing interest in his welfare. All his troubles, he is told, are directly traceable to Free Imports, lack of Preference, want of Stability, Foreign Competition, and the Crass Stupidity of the existing Government. The remedy is quite simple. Just put a little cross opposite the shiny-hatted gentleman’s name, and Prosperity will dawn upon all.

The next few years are spent in continuing to hire himself out when fortunate enough to find a hirer, and in wondering when the promised Prosperity will arrive, or what form it was supposed to take. Suddenly the mystery is solved. He has been betrayed, swindled, duped. How does he know that? Another gentleman is good enough to devote much of his-spare time to patiently explaining what is wrong. A rash of handbills, cards, posters, etc., has broken out, and he gathers that another Election is arranged for him. The gentleman explains that the individual who cajoled his vote from him last time is one of an unscrupulous gang of self-seekers who are bent on ruining the country. They are hypocrites, liars and fools, their sole aim being the feathering of their own nests at the expense of the honest working man. "What have they done for you,” he asks searchingly. Hyam has no difficulty in replying, “Nothing.” Fortunately the remedy is simple. This gentleman stands for Peace, Retrenchment and Reform; Economy, Progress and a Free Breakfast Table; Justice, Liberty and No Tariffs. The mellifluous flow of high-sounding words leaves Hyam slightly dazed. They are not part of his everyday vocabulary and he cannot connect them with any article of use in his daily life, unless it be the Free Breakfast Table. That sounds promising, anyhow. He can’t do less than the previous blighter, thinks Hyam, so here goes my vote for the gent that has shown him up.

It is needless to recount how the ship of prosperity again seemed to have mistaken the harbour and put into some more distant haven. The cause of this was made clear as crystal to our friend Hyam Eezi by a simple working man. The occasion was another General Election, and this man proved in the most convincing manner that the previous two gentlemen were arrant swindlers, both of them employers of labour and consequently living upon the ill-gotten wealth they sweated from the honest workers. What we wanted was a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work, also pensions for mothers, also no taxes on food, also better education. What we wanted was Peace in Europe; Houses to let at low Rents; No Profiteering; No Inhabited House Duty; No Entertainment Tax; Larger Unemployment Dole; More Scholarships; Cheap Electricity; Sugar Beet Factories, and, above all, No Unemployment.

Who could resist it? Not Hyam Eezi! Here was a man of his own class, who talked his own language. Here were thing he could understand. Houses at low rents! No Profiteering! No Unemployment! These were ideas he could handle. And the remedy was so exquisitely simple. Just put a little cross opposite this honest toiler’s name and the Dawn was guaranteed visible within a few short weeks. God!. would polling day never arrive?

Alas! The months have gone by with little to distinguish them from the drab years before. Hyam still hires himself out when he can find a hirer, and starves when he can’t. The honest working man of his last choice is painfully explaining to him how the main caravan missed its way, but how grateful he should be for what has been salvaged. The capitalists of France and of Germany are on much better terms; the capitalists of England and of France are happier together; the “socialist” capitalists of Russia and the ordinary capitalists of England are in a fair way to doing business; the low-rented houses are, er— on paper; the thirty million pounds (think of it, Hyam!) a year off food taxes has reduced the cost of living, except where it has gone up; the landlord has been freed of the irritating Inhabitated House Duty;, your seat at the ”pictures” has gone down a whole penny—in some places; we have increased the pittance to ex-Servicemen whom we sent to be butchered in the War; we have—, but Hyam is bewildered.. He asks himself what all this means to him. Receiving no answer, he seeks out one of those “extremist” fellows who works in the same shop, and inquires rather irrelevantly: “Where the devil are we, mate? ”

“Mate” replies : “Look here, Hyam boy, the main thing that’s wrong is yourself. All these loquacious gentlemen have had one thing in common. They have invited you to trust them. You have done so; that is why you now find yourself ‘trussed.’ Your trouble is glaringly thrust in your face every morning, but you are so used to it, you don’t notice it. You ‘book-on,’ or 'clock-on' at a definite time, and after some hours have gone, you 'book- off.’ But you feel different,  don’t you? Something has gone from you; you are tired; you have less energy. There you have it. The firm have had so many hours of your energy—and what have they given you in exchange? A wage. And what does a wage represent? The cost of replacing the energy, plus a bit to enable you to bring up kiddies to take your place. Many factors make wages vary, but the point round which they vary is the average cost of living. So you see, Hyam, you are a thing of hire, a piece of merchandise, a commodity. In selling your energy, you sell yourself, for you are inseparable. You sell yourself—a piece at a time; and when your energy thins off, you are scrapped. Foreign Agreements don’t help you; Russian and German Loans don’t help you. You still remain a worker. The whole collection of Pensions,' Insurances, Health Benefits, etc., do not really affect you. You remain a worker. Cheap rents, cheap food, low rents, low taxes, cheap everything, do not affect you. Cheap cost of living means cheap wages. With any wages, high or low, you remain a worker. And that is the whole trouble. Palliatives do not palliate; 'benefits' do not benefit; 'something now’ means next to nothing for ever.

"The system under which we live is called Capitalism. Under it the land, factories and means by which we all live are owned by small groups of people. The workers, the great mass of the people, hire themselves out to the capitalist at so much per day, per week or per month. The result of their toil goes to the owners of the tools of production; the workers get their hire. When the capitalists cannot make a profit out of the hire of labour they stop hiring it and the labourer starves. Starving men are desperate men, so good, kind capitalism arranges a scheme of Insurance, that just sufficiently dulls the edge of desperation to secure the continuance of the system of capitalism. Your Labour party has sounded the loud trumpet over their having increased this "benefit” You can read this little lesson for yourself, can’t you.

"The Socialist says there is one problem, and one problem only, before the worker: his wage-slavery. There is one solution and one solution only for his problem; that he and his fellows must own the means whereby they all live. To do this they must capture the political machinery of society—Parliament—not by trusting to any glib-tongued orator to do something for them, but by organising in the workers’ party, the Socialist Party, to capture and use the political machinery in the interests of the whole working class. That is a very brief outline of Socialism, and if it appeals to you, don't trust any more to people who are going to bring Utopia here without the least effort on your part, but come into the Socialist Party and work for Socialism. Socialism will come when enough of you want it. Why not begin to work now, Hyam? ”

W. T. Hopley

Harry and Meghan

So we now have another lovey-dovey fairy tale royal wedding to distract us from our own misery.

Harry, an unemployed ex-soldier, will marry an American citizen but unlike so many others who have married foreign partners, he will be permitted to bring her to live in the UK. Immigration rules introduced in 2012 under then-Home Secretary Theresa May set a minimum earnings threshold of £18,600 for UK citizens to bring a European Economic Area (EEA)spouse or partner to live here with them so to keep immigration down at all costs by focussing upon soft targets.

The Migration Observatory in Oxford estimates that 40 per cent of Britons in full or part-time employment don't earn enough to meet this threshold. The £18,600 figure was calculated as the minimum income amount necessary to avoid a migrant becoming a “burden on the state”.  And the required income goes up if you intend to also bring your children into the country. The threshold rises by £3,800 for one child and £2,400 for each additional child. In 2015, the Children's Commissioner reported that up to 15,000 children were affected by this exclusion rule, most of whom are British citizens. 

 Applicants cannot rely on offers of support from other family members, for instance, parents or grandparents or brothers and sisters (Charly, Betty and Willy can't help out) nor can any other third parties such as employers. The non-EEA partner’s earnings cannot be taken into account if they are working abroad or if they have a job offer in the UK but do not already have work authorisation.

It is highly doubtful that the UK Border Force will be demanding to see Harry's financial statements and the media will continue to ignore the heart-break many other couples and families endure because of where they were born rather than the family they were born into. 


The Fashion Trade and the Environment

Clothes must be designed differently, worn for longer and recycled as much as possible to stop the $2.4 trillion global fashion industry consuming a quarter of the world’s annual carbon budget by 2050. 

Fashion designer Stella McCartney condemned her industry as “incredibly wasteful and harmful to the environment” in a call for a systemic change to the way clothing is produced and used.

The Ellen MacArthur foundation ia report exposed the scale of the waste, and how the throwaway nature of fashion has created a business which creates greenhouse emissions of 1.2bn tonnes a year – larger than that of international flights and shipping combined.
It warns that “if the industry continues on its current path, by 2050, it could use more than 26% of the carbon budget associated with a 2C pathway.”
The report said: “The textiles industry relies mostly on non-renewable resources – 98m tonnes in total per year – including oil to produce synthetic fibres, fertilisers to grow cotton, and chemicals to produce, dye, and finish fibres and textiles. Textiles production (including cotton farming) also uses around 93bn cubic metres of water annually, contributing to problems in some water-scarce regions. With its low rates of utilisation … and low levels of recycling, the current wasteful, linear system is the root cause of this massive and ever expanding pressure on resources.”
The report also reveals that:
  • Less than 1% of material used to make clothing is recycled into new clothing;
  • The estimated cost to the UK economy of landfilling clothing and household textiles each year is about £82m;
  • A truckload of clothing is wasted every second across the world;
  • The average number of times a garment is worn before it ceases to be used has decreased by 36% in 15 years;
  • Half a million tonnes of plastic microfibres are released per year from washed clothes – 16 times more than plastic microbeads from cosmetics – contributing to ocean pollution.
  • The report calls for four actions to be taken: 
  • 1. To phase out substances of concern and microfibre release; 
  • 2. Increase clothing utilisation, for example by the industry supporting and promoting short-term clothing rental businesses; 
  • 3. To radically improve recycling; 
  • 4. To move to renewable materials.
  • Environmental campaigner Dame Ellen MacArthur explained, “Today’s textile industry is built on an outdated linear, take-make-dispose model and is hugely wasteful and polluting,” said MacArthur. “We need a new textile economy in which clothes are designed differently, worn longer, and recycled and reused much more often.”
  • The report reveals the throwaway nature of today’s fashion industry, which is based on a faster turnaround model, with more new collections released per year, at lower prices. The report said more than half of “fast” fashion produced is disposed of in less than a year. In the US, clothes are only worn for around a quarter of the global average. The same pattern is emerging in China, where clothing utilisation has decreased by 70% over the last 15 years. Sixty percent of German and Chinese citizens admit to owning more clothes than they need.
  • Clothing production has nearly doubled in the last 15 years. “Should growth continue as expected, total clothing sales would reach 160m tonnes in 2050 – five times today’s amount," the report said.
  • Cyndi Rhoades, founder of WornAgain, said: “We already have enough clothing and textiles in existence today to satisfy our annual demand of new raw materials for new clothing – all we have to do is make sure it doesn’t end up in the bin..."

THE CHIRPY CHANCELLOR! (weekly poem)

THE CHIRPY CHANCELLOR!

The Budget 22/11. Whilst the Chancellor forecasts a bright future                          
for Britain, the Office of Budget Responsibility is more pessimistic
with unemployment expected to rise and living standards to fall.

The Chancellor chirps but Labour squawks,
The OBR's in doubt;
It's all to do with Brexit talks,
And Britain coming out.

For as the Brexiteer's foretold,
The EU's a soft touch;
As Europe's blowing hot not cold,
And wants our trade so much!

They'll even pay to put things right,
All our Health Service fees; (1)
Without us, Europe's in the shite,
And down upon it's knees.

Because they know the world has more,
Than just a passing trade;
And out of Europe (as before)
Old Britain's got it made!

But some say Brexit will reprise,
The nineteenth century;
With unemployment on the rise,
And pay in jeopardy.

Ironically the very folk,
Who voted we should leave; (2)
Will be the first to see the joke,
That they've been so naïve!

(1) To the annoyance of Brexiteers, rather than getting £350m                             
per week for the Health Service, Mrs May has had to raise                            
Britain’s leaving fee to a new level to enable talks to continue.

(2) “The decision for the UK to leave the European Union was       
overwhelmingly supported in parts of England with low                       
income and education levels”. The Guardian 24th June 2016.

© Richard Layton

WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE

Fear of immigrants and foreigners is associated with support for Brexit, according to studies conducted by an international team of researchers. Two studies suggest that psychological predictors of xenophobia were strongly linked with voting to leave the EU and support for the outcome of the referendum. These findings were true regardless of voter age, gender or education. They began by identifying psychological groups associated with xenophobic views.


“There are three groups that we can differentiate that are supportive of those sorts of views,” said Dr Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, a social psychologist at Goldsmiths, University of London, and the lead author of the Frontiers in Psychology paper. 
Two of these personality traits are commonly used as predictors of prejudice, and have previously been implicated in voting for radical right-wing parties.
These were right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation – the idea that one’s group needs to fight for superiority in the world. The third is a particular focus of Dr Golec de Zavala’s research, a trait known as “collective narcissism” – a belief in the unparalleled greatness of one’s country.
“From Brexit, Trump and support for Vladimir Putin in Russia to the nationalist, ultra- conservative government in Poland, studies from our and other labs show that collective narcissism systematically predicts prejudice, aggression and a tendency to interpret innocent behaviours as provocation to the national group," said Dr Golec de Zavala.
Dr Golec de Zavala and her collaborators found that the three personality traits they examined were independently related to xenophobia and support for Brexit.
Dr Hannah Jones, a sociologist at the University of Warwick said she was “not surprised by this finding,” as “the perceived threat of immigrants is something that has been fostered by successive governments”. Home Office campaigns such as the  ‘go home’ vans have been accused of playing into people’s fears around immigration. “The received wisdom around Westminster is that you can’t talk to people about the pros and cons of immigration, you have to take fear of immigration as a given,” she said.
"The Brexit referendum seems to have led to a further rise in 'anti-foreigner' sentiment,” said Christian Ahlund, chair of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance.
“What people see is acceptable, they do,” agreed Dr Golec de Zavala. “Personally I think the Leave campaign gave a new, acceptable way to express xenophobia.” 


Yemeni misery

The Nobel Women's Initiative demanded that Saudi Arabia and its allies end their humanitarian blockade on wartorn Yemen.

The six former Nobel laureates Mairead Maguire of Northern Ireland, Rigoberta Menchú Tum of Guatemala, Jody Williams of the United States, Shirin Ebadi of Iran, Tawakkol Karman of Yemen, and Leymah Gbowee of Liberia condemned violations and crimes perpetrated on civilians by "all parties in the current conflict," explicitly including Iran — thought to support the Houthi rebels. 
The blockade was denying "live-saving” humanitarian assistance to more than 20 million people, they said, including "at least 7 million — mostly children and women — close to famine.
The regional head of the child agency UNICEF, Geert Cappelaere, said Yemeni children afflicted by preventable diseases were dying at a rate of one every 10 minutes. "The absence of a political solution to the Yemeni crisis is deplorable," he said.

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Fact of the Day

The personal fortune of Jeff Bezos rose $2.4 billion on Friday to $100.3 billion according to Bloomberg calculations. His wealth has grown $32.6 billion this year and he's the first person to be worth more than $100 billion since 1999 when Bill Gates was briefly that rich (Gates is now at $86.8 billion).

Returning degraded land to fertility

Monique Barbut, the Executive Secretary of United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UNCCD)  says "Unless urgent action is taken to restore degraded land, the world is looking at an acute food-insecure future.” 

By 2045, there will be 130 million people who migrated because of desertification, and out of them, 60 million will come from south of the Sahel and Africa.

 By 2050, the world population will reach 10 billion. To feed that extra 2.4 billion, current food production would need to be increased by 75 percent. To do that, we will have to add, from now to 2050, 4 million acres of new land every year.   “Even the most degraded land can be restored with a small investment of 300 dollars per hectare. So, what is needed is not a large sum of money, but lots of manual labour. So perhaps there is not a lot of scope for huge investment and large profits,” she says.

In India,  an estimated 30 percent of total land is already degraded. According to a 2016 report by the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) titled “World Day to Combat Desertification”, the degrading area has increased over 0.5 per cent to 29.3 million hectares in the past decade. Desertification also increased by 1.16 million hectares (m ha) and stood at 82.64 m ha during 2011-13, says the report.

 In Senegal, the regional government allocated tracts of land to women’s groups for collective farming. The initiative has been a big success as the women’s collective managed to grow more food than expected. As a result, the women now have received training to venture into growing crops for market, besides their own consumption.

In Eastern Uganda, the government started a new initiative with women who had no ownership over their land. They have been trained in marketing, managing a collective that cultivates arable land that was once degraded, but is now restored.

Climate change’s effects on land are becoming more and more of a global problem, with major social and political consequences. She mentions the recent droughts witnessed by France, Canada and successive droughts in the US, and also points out the recent exodus of people from drought and desertification in the global south.
“If you see all the migrants coming to Europe, 100 percent of them – not 90 percent but 100 percent – are coming from drylands. There are also migration and radicalism linked to land degradation and desertification. For example, in the drylands of Africa, where desertification is happening, we are seeing food riots and then we are seeing Al Qaeda,” she says, pointing to a study published by UNCCD that explores these links.
Barbut shared her vision of a food-secure future and a clear way to achieve that goal: “By 2050, we will need millions of hectares of new lands to grow 75 percent extra food. Today we are taking new land from forests and wetlands. At the same time, on this planet, you have 2 billion hectares of degraded land. Among this, 500 million are abandoned agricultural land. If we restored 300 million of these 2 billion hectares of land, we can ensure food security for all by 2050.”

Saturday, November 25, 2017

What population explosion?

Average family sizes have been decreasing in England and Wales since the 1930s.


The number of children a woman is likely to have while of childbearing age has fallen to the lowest level on record. Women who turned 45 in 2016 had an average of 1.90 children, down from 2.21 for their mothers’ generation. Teenage motherhood is also dropping, with just 6 per cent of women having had at least one child before their 20th birthday.

Migrants risk increased danger

More than 33,000 people have died attempting the perilous journey across the Mediterranean since 2000, according to a UN study. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) said the Mediterranean Sea remains "by far the world's deadliest border."

Although the number of deaths has dropped since record arrivals on European soil from 2014 to 2016, the risk of death during the journey has risen significantly, according to the report.

controversial migrant deal with Turkey and naval blockades by Libya's coastguard have made the journey across the Mediterranean more dangerous as it shifted the route towards the longer central route to Italy, said Philippe Fargues, one of the UN report's authors and professor at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. "Shutting the shorter and less dangerous routes can open longer and more dangerous routes, thus increasing the likelihood of dying at sea," said Fargues.

Resisting Amazon

Amazon workers in Italy and Germany are on strike during one of the busiest shopping days of the year.
Over 500 employees are carrying out their first ever strike at Amazon's warehouse in Piacenza near Milan over pay. Piazcenza is Amazon's main Italian hub, employing 4,000 people.
Luigi Giove, Secretary General of Italy's CGIL union, said those on strike are calling for shifts which are "not exhausting" and for Amazon to redistribute its profits.
The Verdi trade union said people are also striking at six warehouses in Germany over pay and working conditions. In a statement, Verdi board member Stefanie Nutzberger, said workers faced "high pressure to create more and more in less time, permanent performance controls and monitoring..."

Friday, November 24, 2017

Class Warfare

As Marx’s theory demonstrates, the idea of class warfare has long been with us. 

“The only time discussion of class warfare arises is when those with the most wealth and power start to be critiqued,” says Peter Gilmer of Regina Anti-Poverty Ministry. “Then suddenly it’s class warfare. But when low-income people have their benefits cut and see austerity measures put in place, that’s rarely discussed as class warfare.”

“During the boom, those on fixed incomes actually had their lives get worse because the costs of many things, especially rent, went up. Then, when there was a downturn, the first place the government looked to make cuts was on those who were hurt by the boom,”  says Gilmer.


Michael Truscello, a Calgary academic and co-editor with Ajamu Nangwaya of a 2017 book on social activism with the provocative title Why Don’t the Poor Rise Up?, agrees with Gilmer. “Capitalists deploy the term ‘class warfare’ the way Donald Trump refers to ‘fake news’. They are simply referring to something they don’t like, but the words ring hollow when used by the class conducting the warfare. Capitalism exploits workers and the natural world so completely that the richest one per cent now own half the world’s wealth, and over 15,000 scientists recently warned humanity that we’re causing a mass extinction,” says Truscello. “Yet, somehow, the rich are claiming persecution?”
“Trickle down” is the catchphrase that’s been used to describe wealth at the top filtering down to lower income people. It sounds half-assed reasonable (maybe), but rising child poverty rates, record high debt-to-income ratios, an eroding social safety net, crumbling public infrastructure and more prove it just doesn’t happen.
“Avoiding taxes through legal loopholes is now standard practice,” says Truscello. “To avoid paying the existing tax rates, which are already at record lows across the G8, the rich and their corporations have bought political acquiescence and rigged the system to normalize tax havens. Large Canadian corporations have over 1,000 subsidiaries in offshore tax havens,” Truscello says. “This adds up to about $15 billion in lost tax revenue. Canada, for various reasons, already does not collect almost $50 billion in taxes annually. Meanwhile, health care, public transit, education and other public services go underfunded.”
So next time you hear cries of class warfare from Canada’s privileged elite, remember who the true victims are.

Houses for the Homeless

The number of empty homes north of the border has risen to a seven-year high, according to fresh figures disputed by the Scottish Government.
Almost 80,000 properties are lying unused at a time when charities say the country is facing a housing crisis, with high numbers of people living homeless.
The largest number of unoccupied houses were found in Glasgow and Edinburgh, but every council area has hundreds of empty properties within its boundaries.  There were 8,457 empty homes in Glasgow in 2016, followed by 7,662 in Edinburgh and 5,488 in Fife. The biggest increase in unoccupied dwellings was in Dumfries and Galloway, where the number of empty properties has risen by a third since 2015 to stand at 3111.
In Scotland, there were more than 34,000 applications to local authorities from people looking for accommodation between 2016/17.
 Helen Williams, from the Empty Homes charity, said that councils and the Government must do more to ensure that homes were put to use when so many were sleeping on the streets.
She said: “It is worth bearing in mind that many owners of empty homes want to bring them back into use, and this is why advice from local authority empty homes staff can make a difference between a property being stuck empty and it being brought back to the market for rent or sale.”

Football Assets

Paris St-Germain  paid 222m euros ($260m; £200m) for the player, more than doubling the previous record set when Paul Pogba returned to Manchester United from Juventus for £89m in August 2016.
Latest data from Fifa, the sport's governing body, show there have been 15,291 international transfers so far in 2017, with total spending on players hitting a record $6bn (£4.58bn). That record figure is a 25% increase on the $4.8bn spent in 2016.
"There are two driving factors behind the soaring spending," says Harry Philp, a football finance expert at London-based Portland Advisers.The first is the emergence of China and the huge transfer fees that they are prepared to pay, and the second is the fees English Premier League clubs can spend thanks to their ever more lucrative TV deals. These factors are driving up the value of the global market."
Chinese clubs spent a whopping $451m on football players last year, an increase of 168%. That made them the fifth biggest spenders in the world after England - where clubs splashed out $1.37bn on global stars - Germany, Italy, and Spain. One of the key objectives fuelling China's transfer drive is to raise the overall standard of football in the country so as to assist the national team in reaching the World Cup for only the second time in their history, following their debut in 2002. Chinese clubs are investing almost exclusively on players coming from Europe, but not necessarily Europeans. Many of those making a playing name for themselves in East Asia are South Americans, and Fifa's data shows Brazilians and Argentines are the most transferred nationalities globally.
"Irrespective of how their national team is doing, Brazil continues with its production line of young players for sale around the world," observes Mr Philp. "It is a socio-economic phenomenon, with football still being a way out of the favelas and a means for a youngster to financially support his extended family." Not only does Brazil produce talented players for export, with their stars now plying their trade in 118 countries, but their total financial accumulated sales value came to $594m in 2016, the most for any playing nation.
There have been accusations that clubs such as Chelsea, and to a less extent Manchester City, are scouring the globe for top young talent to stockpile.
"They are then put out on loan to see how they develop," says Mr Philp. " A small proportion will make it into to the first team, and the rest of the pool of talent can be sold on, usually at profit. This provides revenues for the clubs to then buy one global top star player, and also to assist in compliance with financial fair play. These clubs are trading players, almost running what I would call 'asset-management businesses'."

Yemen - When will it end?

The Saudi military alliance announced on Wednesday a partial lifting of the blockade on Yemen. Aid agencies say it is yet to happen.
"We have not yet had any movement as of now," said Jens Laerke, spokesman of the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance.

Jan Egeland, a former U.N. aid chief who now heads the Norwegian Refugee Council, said of the blockade: "In my view this is illegal collective punishment."

"Sending a missile in the direction of Riyadh is really very bad. But those who are suffering from the blockade had nothing to do with this missile," Egeland told reporters. "Even if both the flights and humanitarian shipments will go through now, it is not solving the underlying crisis that a country that needs 90 percent of its goods imported is not getting in commercial food or fuel."

"Yemenis will need more than aid in order to survive the crisis and ward off famine." The International Committee of the Red Cross spokeswoman, Iolanda Jaquemet, said.

Divine Injustice

In India, the health minister from Assam state said cancer "is divine justice" caused by "past sins of a person".
Himanta Biswa Sarma said that people could also get diseases like cancer "because of the sins of their parents".
"God makes us suffer when we sin. Sometimes we come across young men getting inflicted with cancer or young men meeting with accidents. If you observe the background you will come to know that it's divine justice. Nothing else. We have to suffer that divine justice," The Times of India quoted him as saying.

No end to economic misery

"The UK over the last 10 years has created a lot of jobs, but today real wages are below where they were in 2007. That is not the capitalist system delivering its promise that over a decade or so it will raise all boats, and it is a very fundamental issue." Lord Adair Turner, the former head of the Low Pay Commission

 Workers can expect an unprecedented two lost decades of earnings growth and many more years of austerity as a result of the marked slowdown in the economy announced in Philip Hammond’s budget.  Average earnings are on course to be £1,400 a year lower in 2021 than forecast in 2016. That means the recovery in wages will have failed to materialise and average earnings will be below their 2008 level adjusted for inflation.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said in its traditional post-budget analysis that forecasts slashing productivity, earnings and growth in every year until 2022 made “pretty grim reading”, and predicted that even by the middle of the next decade, Britain’s public finances would still be in the red.

Paul Johnson, the IFS director, said “We are in danger of losing not just one but getting on for two decades of earnings growth. We will all have to get used to the idea that steadily rising living standards may be a thing of the increasingly distant past.” Johnson said that despite the extra cash for the NHS, the government’s main austerity plans were still in place.
“This is not the end of austerity. It is not even nearly the end of austerity. There are still nearly £12bn of welfare cuts to work through the system, while day-to-day public services spending is still due to be 3.6% lower in 2022-23 than it is today,”
  • Despite a spending increase over the next five years, the NHS is facing its tightest funding constraints since the 1980s. Annual spending growth of 4% a year after inflation before the financial crisis has fallen to 1% a year at a time when the NHS is being stretched by an expanding and ageing population.