Tuesday, November 05, 2019

Poverty UK

Welfare changes such as universal credit and the bedroom tax are a key factor in the sharp increase in food bank use and the re-emergence of extreme poverty in the UK over the past seven years, a study has concluded. The study calculated the average income of households using food banks was £50 a week after rent. Nine out of 10 people referred to food banks were destitute, meaning they struggled to afford to eat regularly, clothe or clean themselves or their families, the study found. The study punctured some myths about food banks, such as they were mainly used by refugees and migrants or exploited by people who were not in real poverty. Just 14% were from households where at least one person was in work, while nine out of 10 described themselves as white and UK-born.

According to the research, there is “clear and robust evidence” that people struggling on the lowest rungs of the income ladder are pushed rapidly into destitution when their already tight budgets are broken by benefit payment delays, cuts, deductions or sanctions.

The study found five key welfare policies – the rollout of universal credit, increases in benefit sanctions, the bedroom tax, the benefits freeze and the withdrawal of disability benefits – had “sizeable and significant effects” in pushing up demand for food parcels.

One in 50 UK households used a food bank in 2018-19, the study estimated, while at least 3m food parcels were given out – highlighting the rise in charity welfare and the impact of austerity cuts since the start of the decade, when only a small number of food banks existed.
Trussell Trust chief executive, Emma Revie, pointed out that“Hunger in the UK isn’t about food – it’s about people not having enough money.”

The study’s analysis of food bank users found most were in extreme poverty. Average food bank user income was 11% of the UK median income, equivalent to £215 a month (£7 a day) after housing costs for a couple without children. This compared with official relative poverty line income of £262 a week.

Hunger and food bank use affected women disproportionately: they were twice as likely to be food insecure as men, because they were more likely to skip meals so their children could eat, while single mothers accounted for about a fifth of all food bank users.

The research, however, concluded food bank use was “driven by economic need”, noting those dependent on charity food parcels were typically also in poor health, exposed to challenging life experiences such as loss of a job or divorce, and lacked access to informal family support.

For nearly nine out of 10 food bank users, state benefits were a main source of income, and low or interrupted benefit payments were the main trigger of food bank demand. Universal credit, which requires new claimants to wait at least five weeks without income, is identified as the key driver of food bank reliance.
The study estimated that for every 100 claimants moving on to universal credit in a year, an additional 27 food parcels were issued compared with the predecessor benefit. For every 100 households subject to the bedroom tax, an additional 68 parcels were given out. There were 31 extra food parcels distributed for every 100 benefit sanctions.

The withdrawal or refusal of disability benefits had a significant effect on food bank use, with every 100 failed personal independence payment assessments in a year associated with the distribution of an extra 93 food parcels.

Poor mental health affected more than half of households using food banks, while 23% of people referred to food banks were homeless – mainly in temporary accommodation or sofa-surfing.

More than three-quarters of households who used food banks were in arrears, with nearly half of these behind on two or more bills – most commonly rent and council tax. Geographically, food bank usage is most concentrated in former industrial areas of the north and Midlands as well as some coastal towns and London boroughs.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/nov/05/welfare-changes-key-factor-rising-poverty-food-bank-use-study-finds


No comments: