Tuesday, June 02, 2015

The Working Class Hunger Games - Poor Against Poor

Reality TV has a nice connection to our growing low wage economy.  Reality TV is easy to make, costs relatively little, and can be flushed away if it fails.  If a hit occurs, the big profits are frontloaded to the network while “stars” can make money after the cream has been taken away.  There is a certain dark psychological draw of watching people in struggling situations.  These shows still exist because there is an audience to watch.  So it was interesting to see a show called the Briefcase appear on network TV that is couched as an opportunity for struggling families to get a break.  The break is the chance to receive $101,000.  The catch?  Another family is also offered this much and both enter into a modern day version of the prisoner’s dilemma.  It is difficult to watch because these families represent the struggles of millions of Americans caught up in the low wage high debt culture and then are put into an emotional predicament.  Poor against poor.  The choice appears to be seem ruthless and take the money or continue to struggle in your financial misery but show some empathy and likely forfeit the money.  All I could think of watching this is that we are entering a new version of the low wage Hunger Games.

Reality TV for the low wage economy
For those interested in the premise of the show, here it is:
“(Salon) Here’s the premise of the show, as Lyons explains it. A family dealing with what CBS euphemistically calls “financial setbacks” is given a briefcase full of $101,000. They are then shown another “financial setbacks”-plagued family and are told they must decide how much of the cash to share — if any. Unbeknownst to either family, this alienating setup is presented to both. Lyons writes that in the early episodes sent to critics, the families find their responsibility to be so great as to cause one woman to vomit and “several” to say it’s “the hardest decision they’ve ever made.”
How do they make such a decision? By engaging in a time-honored American tradition of separating the poor into two, mutually exclusive categories: those who deserve to be poor, and those who don’t.”

The show basically highlights the lottery aspect of big money in our economy.  This invisible hand comes from out of nowhere to offer a family a respite away from soul crunching poverty but at the same time, you are forced to act out your emotional struggle on screen.  The bread and circus aspect of our media.

taken from here

No comments: